Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP vs. Morrison & Foerster LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
Who Wins Each Category
Each row stands on its own. There is no overall winner; weigh what matters to you.
| Category | Davis Polk & Wardwell | Morrison & Foerster |
|---|---|---|
| Higher pay winsTie | $225,000Market base | $225,000+ |
| Higher wins | $9.80M (wins this category) | $3.29M |
| Lower rank wins | #7 (wins this category) | #27 |
| Lower rank wins | #14 (wins this category) | #42 |
| Higher wins | $3.20B (wins this category) | $1.54B |
| More lawyers wins | 1,000 | 1,021 (wins this category) |
| OfficesMore offices wins | 12 | 16 (wins this category) |
| Nationwide, Chambers USA 2026More Band 1 tables wins | 17 tables (wins this category) | 9 tables |
| 2L OpensEarlier date winsNot Comparable | Open nowSummer 2028 (rolling) | Opened Oct 1, 2026Summer 2028 — combined 2027 1L + 2028 2L program; first-year applicants |
| 1L OpensEarlier date winsNot Comparable | Expected early OctoberClass of 2030 | Opened Oct 1, 2026Summer 2027 |
Sources: Vault 2027 and Am Law 200 FY2025 rankings, Chambers USA 2026, first-year pay as each firm or the market reports it, and program dates from firm career pages on the Job Board. Missing data reads Not Reported and never counts as a loss.
Full Comparison
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Est. 1849
- Morrison & Foerster LLP
Est. 1883
Est. 1849
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Vault #7 / Am Law #14. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, and Bankruptcy/Restructuring. Operates from 12 offices worldwide.
Est. 1883
Morrison & Foerster LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #42. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Artificial Intelligence, Corporate/M&A: Deals in Asia, and FCPA. Operates from 16 offices worldwide.
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP#7
- Morrison & Foerster LLP#27
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP#14
- Morrison & Foerster LLP#42
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP29 records
- Morrison & Foerster LLP15 records
- #7
- #14
- 29 records
- Vault rank
- #27
- Am Law rank
- #42
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 15 records
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP$225,000
- Morrison & Foerster LLP$225,000+
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP$9.80M
- Morrison & Foerster LLP$3.29M
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP$3.20B
- Morrison & Foerster LLP$1.54B
Revenue per lawyer
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP$2.59M
- Morrison & Foerster LLP$1.51M
- $225,000
- $9.80M
- $3.20B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.59M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $3.29M
- Firm revenue
- $1.54B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.51M
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPNot Reported
- Morrison & Foerster LLP1,950
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPNot Reported
- Morrison & Foerster LLPNot Reported
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP3.5:1
- Morrison & Foerster LLPNot Reported
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP~1,000
- Morrison & Foerster LLP~1,000
Offices
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP12
- Morrison & Foerster LLP16
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 3.5:1
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 12
- Billable target
- 1,950
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 16
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP99.4%
- Morrison & Foerster LLP98.6%
Class size
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP220 (year not confirmed)
- Morrison & Foerster LLP78 (year not confirmed)
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPCentralized staffing
- Morrison & Foerster LLPNot Reported
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPNo
- Morrison & Foerster LLPYes
- 99.4%
- Class size
- 220 (year not confirmed)
- Centralized staffing
- No
- Offer rate
- 98.6%
- Class size
- 78 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
1L program
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPNo 1L summer program
- Morrison & Foerster LLP1L summer program
1L applications open
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPExpected early October
- Morrison & Foerster LLPOpened Oct 1
2L applications open
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPOpen now
- Morrison & Foerster LLPOpened Oct 1
2L deadline
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPNot announced
- Morrison & Foerster LLPFeb 28, 2027
- 1L program
- No 1L summer program
- 1L applications open
- Expected early October
- 2L applications open
- Open now
- 2L deadline
- Not announced
- 1L program
- 1L summer program
- 1L applications open
- Opened Oct 1
- 2L applications open
- Opened Oct 1
- 2L deadline
- Feb 28, 2027
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 5
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 2
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 1
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 4
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 1
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 3 · Elite
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.
More head-to-head comparisons
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Latham & Watkins vs. Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Latham & Watkins vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Kirkland & Ellis vs. Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Kirkland & Ellis vs. Morrison & Foerster
Firm data comes from each firm’s own publications, Chambers USA and Vault; see Davis Polk & Wardwell and Morrison & Foerster for sources and dates.