Sullivan & Cromwell LLP vs. Morrison & Foerster LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
Who Wins Each Category
Each row stands on its own. There is no overall winner; weigh what matters to you.
| Category | Sullivan & Cromwell | Morrison & Foerster |
|---|---|---|
| Higher pay wins | $235,000+ (wins this category) | $225,000+ |
| Higher wins | $7.57M (wins this category) | $3.29M |
| Lower rank wins | #5 (wins this category) | #27 |
| Lower rank wins | #25 (wins this category) | #42 |
| Higher wins | $2.28B (wins this category) | $1.54B |
| More lawyers wins | 1,000 | 1,021 (wins this category) |
| OfficesMore offices wins | 11 | 16 (wins this category) |
| Nationwide, Chambers USA 2026More Band 1 tables wins | 12 tables (wins this category) | 9 tables |
| 2L OpensEarlier date wins | Opened Nov 1, 2026Summer 2028 | Opened Oct 1, 2026 (wins this category)Summer 2028 — combined 2027 1L + 2028 2L program; first-year applicants |
| 1L OpensEarlier date wins | No 1L Program | Opened Oct 1, 2026Summer 2027 |
Sources: Vault 2027 and Am Law 200 FY2025 rankings, Chambers USA 2026, first-year pay as each firm or the market reports it, and program dates from firm career pages on the Job Board. Missing data reads Not Reported and never counts as a loss.
Full Comparison
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Est. 1879
- Morrison & Foerster LLP
Est. 1883
Est. 1879
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Vault #5 / Am Law #25. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Corporate Crime & Investigations, Corporate/M&A, and Corporate/M&A: Takeover Defense. Operates from 11 offices worldwide.
Est. 1883
Morrison & Foerster LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #42. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Artificial Intelligence, Corporate/M&A: Deals in Asia, and FCPA. Operates from 16 offices worldwide.
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP#5
- Morrison & Foerster LLP#27
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP#25
- Morrison & Foerster LLP#42
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP21 records
- Morrison & Foerster LLP15 records
- #5
- #25
- 21 records
- Vault rank
- #27
- Am Law rank
- #42
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 15 records
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$235,000+
- Morrison & Foerster LLP$225,000+
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$7.57M
- Morrison & Foerster LLP$3.29M
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$2.28B
- Morrison & Foerster LLP$1.54B
Revenue per lawyer
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$2.51M
- Morrison & Foerster LLP$1.51M
- $235,000+
- $7.57M
- $2.28B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.51M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $3.29M
- Firm revenue
- $1.54B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.51M
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNot Reported
- Morrison & Foerster LLP1,950
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNot Reported
- Morrison & Foerster LLPNot Reported
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP2.4:1
- Morrison & Foerster LLPNot Reported
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP~1,000
- Morrison & Foerster LLP~1,000
Offices
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP11
- Morrison & Foerster LLP16
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 2.4:1
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 11
- Billable target
- 1,950
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 16
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP100%
- Morrison & Foerster LLP98.6%
Class size
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP216 (2026)
- Morrison & Foerster LLP78 (year not confirmed)
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPCentralized staffing
- Morrison & Foerster LLPNot Reported
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNo
- Morrison & Foerster LLPYes
- 100%
- Class size
- 216 (2026)
- Centralized staffing
- No
- Offer rate
- 98.6%
- Class size
- 78 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
1L program
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNo 1L summer program
- Morrison & Foerster LLP1L summer program
1L applications open
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNot Reported
- Morrison & Foerster LLPOpened Oct 1
2L applications open
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPOpened Nov 1
- Morrison & Foerster LLPOpened Oct 1
2L deadline
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPMar 5, 2027
- Morrison & Foerster LLPFeb 28, 2027
- 1L program
- No 1L summer program
- 1L applications open
- Not Reported
- 2L applications open
- Opened Nov 1
- 2L deadline
- Mar 5, 2027
- 1L program
- 1L summer program
- 1L applications open
- Opened Oct 1
- 2L applications open
- Opened Oct 1
- 2L deadline
- Feb 28, 2027
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 2
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 4
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 4
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 4
- Morrison & Foerster LLPBand 1
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.
More head-to-head comparisons
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Sullivan & Cromwell
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Sullivan & Cromwell
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Sullivan & Cromwell
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Latham & Watkins vs. Sullivan & Cromwell
- Latham & Watkins vs. Morrison & Foerster
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Kirkland & Ellis
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Milbank
Firm data comes from each firm’s own publications, Chambers USA and Vault; see Sullivan & Cromwell and Morrison & Foerster for sources and dates.