Latham & Watkins LLP vs. Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
Who Wins Each Category
Each row stands on its own. There is no overall winner; weigh what matters to you.
| Category | Latham & Watkins | Sullivan & Cromwell |
|---|---|---|
| Higher pay wins | $225,000 | $235,000+ (wins this category) |
| Higher wins | $8.65M (wins this category) | $7.57M |
| Lower rank wins | #4 (wins this category) | #5 |
| Lower rank wins | #2 (wins this category) | #25 |
| Higher wins | $8.30B (wins this category) | $2.28B |
| More lawyers wins | 3,724 (wins this category) | 1,000 |
| OfficesMore offices wins | 34 (wins this category) | 11 |
| Nationwide, Chambers USA 2026More Band 1 tables wins | 46 tables (wins this category) | 12 tables |
| 2L OpensSummer 2028Earlier date winsTie | Opened Nov 1, 2026 | Opened Nov 1, 2026 |
| 1L OpensEarlier date wins | Opened Nov 1, 2026Summer 2027 | No 1L Program |
Sources: Vault 2027 and Am Law 200 FY2025 rankings, Chambers USA 2026, first-year pay as each firm or the market reports it, and program dates from firm career pages on the Job Board. Missing data reads Not Reported and never counts as a loss.
Full Comparison
- Latham & Watkins LLP
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Est. 1879
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
Latham & Watkins LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #4 / Am Law #2, founded in Los Angeles, CA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Antitrust: Cartel, and Appellate Law. Operates from 34 offices worldwide.
Est. 1879
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Vault #5 / Am Law #25. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Corporate Crime & Investigations, Corporate/M&A, and Corporate/M&A: Takeover Defense. Operates from 11 offices worldwide.
- Latham & Watkins LLP#4
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP#5
- Latham & Watkins LLP#2
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP#25
- Latham & Watkins LLP96 records
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP21 records
- #4
- #2
- 96 records
- Vault rank
- #5
- Am Law rank
- #25
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 21 records
- Latham & Watkins LLP$225,000
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$235,000+
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.65M
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$7.57M
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.30B
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$2.28B
Revenue per lawyer
- Latham & Watkins LLP$2.23M
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$2.51M
- $225,000
- $8.65M
- $8.30B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.23M
- First-Year Comp
- $235,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $7.57M
- Firm revenue
- $2.28B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.51M
- Latham & Watkins LLP1,900
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLP2.7:1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP2.4:1
- Latham & Watkins LLP~3,700
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP~1,000
Offices
- Latham & Watkins LLP34
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP11
- 1,900
- Not Reported
- 2.7:1
- ~3,700
- Offices
- 34
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 2.4:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 11
- Latham & Watkins LLP100%
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP100%
Class size
- Latham & Watkins LLP398 (year not confirmed)
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP216 (2026)
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPCentralized staffing
- Latham & Watkins LLPNo
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNo
- 100%
- Class size
- 398 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- No
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 216 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Centralized staffing
- Specific practice area
- No
1L program
- Latham & Watkins LLPNo 1L summer program
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNo 1L summer program
1L applications open
- Latham & Watkins LLPOpened Nov 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNot Reported
2L applications open
- Latham & Watkins LLPOpened Nov 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPOpened Nov 1
2L deadline
- Latham & Watkins LLPJan 29, 2027
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPMar 5, 2027
- 1L program
- No 1L summer program
- 1L applications open
- Opened Nov 1
- 2L applications open
- Opened Nov 1
- 2L deadline
- Jan 29, 2027
- 1L program
- No 1L summer program
- 1L applications open
- Not Reported
- 2L applications open
- Opened Nov 1
- 2L deadline
- Mar 5, 2027
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 3
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 3
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 2
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 2
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 4
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 3
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 2
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 4
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 3
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 3
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.
More head-to-head comparisons
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Latham & Watkins
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Sullivan & Cromwell
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Latham & Watkins
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Sullivan & Cromwell
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Latham & Watkins
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Sullivan & Cromwell
- Latham & Watkins vs. Kirkland & Ellis
- Latham & Watkins vs. Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Latham & Watkins vs. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Latham & Watkins vs. Milbank
- Latham & Watkins vs. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
- Latham & Watkins vs. Sidley Austin
Firm data comes from each firm’s own publications, Chambers USA and Vault; see Latham & Watkins and Sullivan & Cromwell for sources and dates.