Sullivan & Cromwell LLP vs. Goodwin Procter LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
Who Wins Each Category
Each row stands on its own. There is no overall winner; weigh what matters to you.
| Category | Sullivan & Cromwell | Goodwin Procter |
|---|---|---|
| Higher pay wins | $235,000+ (wins this category) | $225,000 |
| Higher wins | $7.57M (wins this category) | $4.24M |
| Lower rank wins | #5 (wins this category) | #31 |
| Lower rank wins | #25 | #21 (wins this category) |
| Higher wins | $2.28B | $2.72B (wins this category) |
| More lawyers wins | 1,000 | 1,800 (wins this category) |
| OfficesMore offices wins | 11 | 18 (wins this category) |
| Nationwide, Chambers USA 2026More Band 1 tables wins | 12 tables (wins this category) | 6 tables |
| 2L OpensSummer 2028Earlier date wins | Opened Nov 1, 2026 (wins this category) | Opened Nov 2, 2026 |
| 1L OpensEarlier date wins | No 1L Program | Not Reported |
Sources: Vault 2027 and Am Law 200 FY2025 rankings, Chambers USA 2026, first-year pay as each firm or the market reports it, and program dates from firm career pages on the Job Board. Missing data reads Not Reported and never counts as a loss.
Full Comparison
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Est. 1879
- Goodwin Procter LLP
Est. 1912 · Boston
Est. 1879
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Vault #5 / Am Law #25. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Corporate Crime & Investigations, Corporate/M&A, and Corporate/M&A: Takeover Defense. Operates from 11 offices worldwide.
Est. 1912 · Boston
Goodwin Procter LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #21, founded in Boston, Massachusetts. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance: Corporate & Regulatory, Capital Markets, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP#5
- Goodwin Procter LLP#31
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP#25
- Goodwin Procter LLP#21
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP21 records
- Goodwin Procter LLP18 records
- #5
- #25
- 21 records
- Vault rank
- #31
- Am Law rank
- #21
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 18 records
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$235,000+
- Goodwin Procter LLP$225,000
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$7.57M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$4.24M
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$2.28B
- Goodwin Procter LLP$2.72B
Revenue per lawyer
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP$2.51M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$1.63M
- $235,000+
- $7.57M
- $2.28B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.51M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $4.24M
- Firm revenue
- $2.72B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.63M
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLP1,950
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP2.4:1
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP~1,000
- Goodwin Procter LLP~1,800
Offices
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP11
- Goodwin Procter LLP18
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 2.4:1
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 11
- Billable target
- 1,950
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,800
- Offices
- 18
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP100%
- Goodwin Procter LLP100%
Class size
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLP216 (2026)
- Goodwin Procter LLP67 (year not confirmed)
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPCentralized staffing
- Goodwin Procter LLPCentralized staffing
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNo
- Goodwin Procter LLPCase by Case
- 100%
- Class size
- 216 (2026)
- Centralized staffing
- No
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 67 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Centralized staffing
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
1L program
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNo 1L summer program
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
1L applications open
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
2L applications open
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPOpened Nov 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPOpened Nov 2
2L deadline
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPMar 5, 2027
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot announced
- 1L program
- No 1L summer program
- 1L applications open
- Not Reported
- 2L applications open
- Opened Nov 1
- 2L deadline
- Mar 5, 2027
- 1L program
- Not Reported
- 1L applications open
- Not Reported
- 2L applications open
- Opened Nov 2
- 2L deadline
- Not announced
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 5 · Elite
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 4
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 5
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 4
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
- Sullivan & Cromwell LLPBand 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.
More head-to-head comparisons
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Sullivan & Cromwell
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Goodwin Procter
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Sullivan & Cromwell
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Goodwin Procter
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Sullivan & Cromwell
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Goodwin Procter
- Latham & Watkins vs. Sullivan & Cromwell
- Latham & Watkins vs. Goodwin Procter
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Kirkland & Ellis
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Davis Polk & Wardwell
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Milbank
Firm data comes from each firm’s own publications, Chambers USA and Vault; see Sullivan & Cromwell and Goodwin Procter for sources and dates.