Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP vs. Goodwin Procter LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
Who Wins Each Category
Each row stands on its own. There is no overall winner; weigh what matters to you.
| Category | Gibson | Goodwin Procter |
|---|---|---|
| Higher pay winsTie | $225,000 | $225,000 |
| Higher wins | $8.89M (wins this category) | $4.24M |
| Lower rank wins | #8 (wins this category) | #31 |
| Lower rank wins | #4 (wins this category) | #21 |
| Higher wins | $4.21B (wins this category) | $2.72B |
| More lawyers wins | 2,200 (wins this category) | 1,800 |
| OfficesMore offices wins | 22 (wins this category) | 18 |
| Nationwide, Chambers USA 2026More Band 1 tables wins | 21 tables (wins this category) | 6 tables |
| 2L OpensSummer 2028Earlier date winsTie | Opened Nov 2, 2026 | Opened Nov 2, 2026 |
| 1L OpensEarlier date wins | Opened Nov 2, 20261L Summer 2027 | Not Reported |
Sources: Vault 2027 and Am Law 200 FY2025 rankings, Chambers USA 2026, first-year pay as each firm or the market reports it, and program dates from firm career pages on the Job Board. Missing data reads Not Reported and never counts as a loss.
Full Comparison
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Est. 1890
- Goodwin Procter LLP
Est. 1912 · Boston
Est. 1890
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #8 / Am Law #4. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Accountant and Auditor Liability, Antitrust, and Antitrust: Cartel. Operates from 22 offices worldwide.
Est. 1912 · Boston
Goodwin Procter LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #21, founded in Boston, Massachusetts. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance: Corporate & Regulatory, Capital Markets, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP#8
- Goodwin Procter LLP#31
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP#4
- Goodwin Procter LLP#21
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP48 records
- Goodwin Procter LLP18 records
- #8
- #4
- 48 records
- Vault rank
- #31
- Am Law rank
- #21
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 18 records
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP$225,000
- Goodwin Procter LLP$225,000
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP$8.89M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$4.24M
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP$4.21B
- Goodwin Procter LLP$2.72B
Revenue per lawyer
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP$2.04M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$1.63M
- $225,000
- $8.89M
- $4.21B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.04M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $4.24M
- Firm revenue
- $2.72B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.63M
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLP1,950
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP1.6:1
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP~2,200
- Goodwin Procter LLP~1,800
Offices
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP22
- Goodwin Procter LLP18
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 1.6:1
- ~2,200
- Offices
- 22
- Billable target
- 1,950
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,800
- Offices
- 18
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP97%
- Goodwin Procter LLP100%
Class size
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP156 (year not confirmed)
- Goodwin Procter LLP67 (year not confirmed)
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFree market
- Goodwin Procter LLPCentralized staffing
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPNo
- Goodwin Procter LLPCase by Case
- 97%
- Class size
- 156 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- No
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 67 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Centralized staffing
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
1L program
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP1L fellowship
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
1L applications open
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPOpened Nov 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
2L applications open
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPOpened Nov 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPOpened Nov 2
2L deadline
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFeb 5, 2027
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot announced
- 1L program
- 1L fellowship
- 1L applications open
- Opened Nov 2
- 2L applications open
- Opened Nov 2
- 2L deadline
- Feb 5, 2027
- 1L program
- Not Reported
- 1L applications open
- Not Reported
- 2L applications open
- Opened Nov 2
- 2L deadline
- Not announced
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 5
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 2
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 4
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 5
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 4
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 3
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.
More head-to-head comparisons
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Cravath, Swaine & Moore vs. Goodwin Procter
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz vs. Goodwin Procter
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom vs. Goodwin Procter
- Latham & Watkins vs. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Latham & Watkins vs. Goodwin Procter
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Goodwin Procter
- Kirkland & Ellis vs. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
- Kirkland & Ellis vs. Goodwin Procter
Firm data comes from each firm’s own publications, Chambers USA and Vault; see Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Goodwin Procter for sources and dates.