Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP vs. Goodwin Procter LLP vs. Fish & Richardson P.C.
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
Est. 2004 · Merger
- Goodwin Procter LLP
Est. 1912 · Boston
- Fish & Richardson P.C.
Est. 1878 · Boston
Est. 2004 · Merger
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Vault #25 / Am Law #38. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, FCPA, and Financial Services Regulation: Broker Dealer (Compliance & Enforcement).
Est. 1912 · Boston
Goodwin Procter LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #21, founded in Boston, Massachusetts. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance: Corporate & Regulatory, Capital Markets, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
Est. 1878 · Boston
Fish & Richardson P.C. is a ~400-attorney firm, founded in Boston. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property: Litigation, and Intellectual Property: Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Operates from 19 offices worldwide.
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP#25
- Goodwin Procter LLP#31
- Fish & Richardson P.C.#84
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP#38
- Goodwin Procter LLP#21
- Fish & Richardson P.C.#103
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP13 records
- Goodwin Procter LLP18 records
- Fish & Richardson P.C.7 records
- #25
- #38
- 13 records
- Vault rank
- #31
- Am Law rank
- #21
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 18 records
- Vault rank
- #84
- Am Law rank
- #103
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 7 records
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP$225,000
- Goodwin Procter LLP$225,000
- Fish & Richardson P.C.$225,000
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP$3.46M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$4.24M
- Fish & Richardson P.C.$2.03M
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP$1.61B
- Goodwin Procter LLP$2.72B
- Fish & Richardson P.C.$556.37M
Revenue per lawyer
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP$1.64M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$1.63M
- Fish & Richardson P.C.$950
- $225,000
- $3.46M
- $1.61B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.64M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $4.24M
- Firm revenue
- $2.72B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.63M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.03M
- Firm revenue
- $556.37M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $950
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP2,000
- Goodwin Procter LLP1,950
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Not Reported
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Fish & Richardson P.C.8 years
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP2.6:1
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Fish & Richardson P.C.0.5:1
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP~1,100
- Goodwin Procter LLP~1,800
- Fish & Richardson P.C.~400
Offices
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP12
- Goodwin Procter LLP18
- Fish & Richardson P.C.19
- 2,000
- Not Reported
- 2.6:1
- ~1,100
- Offices
- 12
- Billable target
- 1,950
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,800
- Offices
- 18
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- 8 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.5:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~400
- Offices
- 19
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP100%
- Goodwin Procter LLP100%
- Fish & Richardson P.C.96%
Class size
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP61 (year not confirmed)
- Goodwin Procter LLP67 (year not confirmed)
- Fish & Richardson P.C.33 (year not confirmed)
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLPCentralized staffing
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Free market
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPNo
- Goodwin Procter LLPCase by Case
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Yes
- 100%
- Class size
- 61 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- No
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 67 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Centralized staffing
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 96%
- Class size
- 33 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPBand 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 5
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Band 1
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPBand 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 4
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Band 1
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPBand 5
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 5
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Band 1
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPBand 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 2
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Band 3
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPBand 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 4
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Band 4
- Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPBand 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 4
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Band 4
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.