Williams & Connolly LLP vs. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP vs. Latham & Watkins LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Williams & Connolly LLP
Est. 1967
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Est. 1944 · Seattle
- Latham & Watkins LLP
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
Est. 1967
Williams & Connolly LLP is a ~422-attorney firm, Vault #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Accountant and Auditor Liability, Appellate Law, and Law Firm Defense.
Est. 1944 · Seattle
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP is a mid-size firm of ~635 attorneys, founded in Seattle, WA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Advertising: NAD Proceedings, Banking & Finance, and Corporate/M&A.
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
Latham & Watkins LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #4 / Am Law #2, founded in Los Angeles, CA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Antitrust: Cartel, and Appellate Law. Operates from 34 offices worldwide.
- Williams & Connolly LLP#17
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP#74
- Latham & Watkins LLP#4
- Williams & Connolly LLP#87
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP#90
- Latham & Watkins LLP#2
- Williams & Connolly LLP8 records
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP21 records
- Latham & Watkins LLP96 records
- #17
- #87
- 8 records
- Vault rank
- #74
- Am Law rank
- #90
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 21 records
- Vault rank
- #4
- Am Law rank
- #2
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 96 records
- Williams & Connolly LLP$260,000
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$225,000+
- Latham & Watkins LLP$225,000
- Williams & Connolly LLP$3.82M
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$1.39M
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.65M
- Williams & Connolly LLP$701.81M
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$674.20M
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.30B
Revenue per lawyer
- Williams & Connolly LLP$1.66M
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$1.06M
- Latham & Watkins LLP$2.23M
- $260,000
- $3.82M
- $701.81M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.66M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.39M
- Firm revenue
- $674.20M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.06M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $8.65M
- Firm revenue
- $8.30B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.23M
- Williams & Connolly LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLP1,900
- Williams & Connolly LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- Williams & Connolly LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLP2.7:1
- Williams & Connolly LLP~400
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP~650
- Latham & Watkins LLP~3,700
Offices
- Williams & Connolly LLP2
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP9
- Latham & Watkins LLP34
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- ~400
- Offices
- 2
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~650
- Offices
- 9
- Billable target
- 1,900
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 2.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,700
- Offices
- 34
- Williams & Connolly LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP100%
- Latham & Watkins LLP100%
Class size
- Williams & Connolly LLP44 (2026)
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP25 (2026)
- Latham & Watkins LLP398 (year not confirmed)
- Williams & Connolly LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- Williams & Connolly LLPNo
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPCase by Case
- Latham & Watkins LLPNo
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 44 (2026)
- Not Reported
- No
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 25 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 398 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- No
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Williams & Connolly LLPBand 1
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 1
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 2
- Williams & Connolly LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 4 · Highly Regarded
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.