Troutman Pepper Locke LLP vs. Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP vs. McGuireWoods LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Est. 2025 · Merger
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Est. 2018 · Merger
- McGuireWoods LLP
Est. 1834
Est. 2025 · Merger
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #33. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Corporate/Commercial, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 31 offices worldwide.
Est. 2018 · Merger
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP is a mid-size firm of ~900 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Bankruptcy/Restructuring, Capital Markets: Securitization: MSR, and Capital Markets: Securitization: RMBS. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
Est. 1834
McGuireWoods LLP is a mid-size firm of ~944 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 22 offices worldwide.
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP#72
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP#93
- McGuireWoods LLP#68
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP#33
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP#64
- McGuireWoods LLP#54
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP23 records
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP21 records
- McGuireWoods LLP24 records
- #72
- #33
- 23 records
- Vault rank
- #93
- Am Law rank
- #64
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 21 records
- Vault rank
- #68
- Am Law rank
- #54
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 24 records
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$235,000+
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP$225,000
- McGuireWoods LLP$215,000
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.85M
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP$2.63M
- McGuireWoods LLP$2.68M
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.85B
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP$960.95M
- McGuireWoods LLP$1.21B
Revenue per lawyer
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.16M
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP$1.31M
- McGuireWoods LLP$1.29M
- $235,000+
- $1.85M
- $1.85B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.16M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.63M
- Firm revenue
- $960.95M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.31M
- First-Year Comp
- $215,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.68M
- Firm revenue
- $1.21B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.29M
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP2,000
- McGuireWoods LLPNot Reported
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPNot Reported
- McGuireWoods LLPNot Reported
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP0.7:1
- McGuireWoods LLPNot Reported
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP~1,600
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP~900
- McGuireWoods LLP~950
Offices
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP31
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP18
- McGuireWoods LLP22
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- ~1,600
- Offices
- 31
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~900
- Offices
- 18
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~950
- Offices
- 22
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP94.6%
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP100%
- McGuireWoods LLP79.4%
Class size
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP104 (2026)
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP46 (year not confirmed)
- McGuireWoods LLP34 (2026)
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFree market
- McGuireWoods LLPNot Reported
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPCase by Case
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPYes
- McGuireWoods LLPNo
- 94.6%
- Class size
- 104 (2026)
- Not Reported
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 46 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 79.4%
- Class size
- 34 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- No
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 1
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPBand 4
- McGuireWoods LLPBand 1
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 1
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPBand 1
- McGuireWoods LLPBand 2
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 3
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPBand 1
- McGuireWoods LLPBand 1
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPBand 1
- McGuireWoods LLPBand 1
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 4
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPBand 1
- McGuireWoods LLPBand 4
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPBand 2
- McGuireWoods LLPBand 1
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 4
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPBand 4
- McGuireWoods LLPBand 2
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 5 · Elite
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPBand 4 · Elite
- McGuireWoods LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 5
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPBand 4
- McGuireWoods LLPBand 5
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- McGuireWoods LLPBand 5 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.