Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
Est. 1889
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
Est. 1897
Est. 1889
A litigation-focused firm known for complex commercial and product matters, with additional strength in life sciences, privacy, and IP.
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
Est. 1897
Southeastern roots with a broad national platform and a mix of corporate, litigation, real estate, healthcare, and public-policy work.
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPNot Reported
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.#93
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP#60
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.12 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP13 records
- Not Reported
- #93
- 12 records
- Vault rank
- #55
- Am Law rank
- #17
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 31 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #60
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 13 records
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPNot Reported
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.$2.32M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP$2.51M
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.$643.39M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP$1.05B
Revenue per lawyer
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.$1.16M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP$1.01M
- Not Reported
- $2.32M
- $643.39M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.16M
- First-Year Comp
- Varies by office
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.90M
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- First-Year Comp
- Not Reported
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.51M
- Firm revenue
- $1.05B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.01M
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPNot Reported
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPNot Reported
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPNot Reported
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.~550
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP~1,050
Offices
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.18
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP37
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- ~550
- Offices
- 18
- Billable target
- Varies by office
- Partnership track
- 9 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,050
- Offices
- 37
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.100%
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP79.5%
Class size
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.33 (2026)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP88 (2025)
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPNot Reported
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Yes
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPYes
- 100%
- Class size
- 33 (2026)
- Not Reported
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 79.5%
- Class size
- 88 (2025)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Band 3 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Band 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPBand 2
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Band 1 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Band 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPBand 5
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Band 2 · Highly Regarded
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPBand 4 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.