Reed Smith LLP vs. Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP vs. Cozen O'Connor P.C.
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Reed Smith LLP
Est. 1877
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Est. 2020 · Merger
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.
Est. 1970 · Philadelphia
Est. 1877
Reed Smith LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #40. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Energy & Natural Resources. Operates from 22 offices worldwide.
Est. 2020 · Merger
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, and Capital Markets: Debt & Equity. Operates from 20 offices worldwide.
Est. 1970 · Philadelphia
Cozen O'Connor P.C. is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, founded in Philadelphia, PA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Energy & Natural Resources, and Higher Education. Operates from 34 offices worldwide.
- Reed Smith LLP#59
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP#85
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.#88
- Reed Smith LLP#40
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP#56
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.#80
- Reed Smith LLP14 records
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP22 records
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.10 records
- #59
- #40
- 14 records
- Vault rank
- #85
- Am Law rank
- #56
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 22 records
- Vault rank
- #88
- Am Law rank
- #80
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 10 records
- Reed Smith LLP$225,000
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$225,000
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.$180,000 - $215,000
- Reed Smith LLP$2.02M
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$1.61M
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.$1.29M
- Reed Smith LLP$1.59B
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$1.19B
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.$803.00M
Revenue per lawyer
- Reed Smith LLP$1.11M
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$1.16M
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.$949K
- $225,000
- $2.02M
- $1.59B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.11M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.61M
- Firm revenue
- $1.19B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.16M
- First-Year Comp
- $180,000 - $215,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.29M
- Firm revenue
- $803.00M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $949K
- Reed Smith LLP2,000
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1,900
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Not Reported
- Reed Smith LLPNot Reported
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPNot Reported
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Not Reported
- Reed Smith LLP1:1
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP0.8:1
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.0.5:1
- Reed Smith LLP~1,600
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP~1,200
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.~1,000
Offices
- Reed Smith LLP22
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP20
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.34
- 2,000
- Not Reported
- 1:1
- ~1,600
- Offices
- 22
- Billable target
- 1,900
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.8:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,200
- Offices
- 20
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.5:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 34
- Reed Smith LLP95.3%
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP98.5%
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.96.6%
Class size
- Reed Smith LLP41 (year not confirmed)
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP72 (year not confirmed)
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.14 (year not confirmed)
- Reed Smith LLPNot Reported
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPNot Reported
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Not Reported
- Reed Smith LLPNo
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPCase by Case
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.No
- 95.3%
- Class size
- 41 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- No
- Offer rate
- 98.5%
- Class size
- 72 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 96.6%
- Class size
- 14 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- No
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Reed Smith LLPBand 1
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 2
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Band 3
- Reed Smith LLPBand 1
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 3
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Band 2
- Reed Smith LLPBand 4
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 1
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Band 2
- Reed Smith LLPBand 3
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 2
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Band 2
- Reed Smith LLPBand 3
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 2
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Band 3
- Reed Smith LLPBand 4
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 3
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Band 3
- Reed Smith LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Band 3 · Highly Regarded
- Reed Smith LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Band 5 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.