Proskauer Rose LLP vs. Seyfarth Shaw LLP vs. Goodwin Procter LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Proskauer Rose LLP
Est. 1875 · New York
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Est. 1945 · Chicago
- Goodwin Procter LLP
Est. 1912 · Boston
Est. 1875 · New York
Proskauer Rose LLP is a mid-size firm of ~829 attorneys, Am Law #41, founded in New York, NY. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation, and Healthcare. Operates from 12 offices worldwide.
Est. 1945 · Chicago
Seyfarth Shaw LLP is a mid-size firm of ~913 attorneys, founded in Chicago, IL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Labor & Employment, and Retail. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
Est. 1912 · Boston
Goodwin Procter LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #21, founded in Boston, Massachusetts. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance: Corporate & Regulatory, Capital Markets, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
- Proskauer Rose LLP#33
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP#89
- Goodwin Procter LLP#31
- Proskauer Rose LLP#41
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP#63
- Goodwin Procter LLP#21
- Proskauer Rose LLP10 records
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP6 records
- Goodwin Procter LLP18 records
- #33
- #41
- 10 records
- Vault rank
- #89
- Am Law rank
- #63
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 6 records
- Vault rank
- #31
- Am Law rank
- #21
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 18 records
- Proskauer Rose LLP$225,000
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$225,000+
- Goodwin Procter LLP$225,000
- Proskauer Rose LLP$5.02M
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$1.90M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$4.24M
- Proskauer Rose LLP$1.58B
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$990.78M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$2.72B
Revenue per lawyer
- Proskauer Rose LLP$1.91M
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$1.09M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$1.63M
- $225,000
- $5.02M
- $1.58B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.91M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.90M
- Firm revenue
- $990.78M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.09M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $4.24M
- Firm revenue
- $2.72B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.63M
- Proskauer Rose LLPNot Reported
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLP1,950
- Proskauer Rose LLPNot Reported
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Proskauer Rose LLP1.3:1
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP0.6:1
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Proskauer Rose LLP~850
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP~900
- Goodwin Procter LLP~1,800
Offices
- Proskauer Rose LLP12
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP18
- Goodwin Procter LLP18
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 1.3:1
- ~850
- Offices
- 12
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~900
- Offices
- 18
- Billable target
- 1,950
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,800
- Offices
- 18
- Proskauer Rose LLP100%
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP86.4%
- Goodwin Procter LLP100%
Class size
- Proskauer Rose LLP61 (year not confirmed)
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP24 (year not confirmed)
- Goodwin Procter LLP67 (year not confirmed)
- Proskauer Rose LLPCentralized staffing
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPFree market
- Goodwin Procter LLPCentralized staffing
- Proskauer Rose LLPNo
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPYes
- Goodwin Procter LLPCase by Case
- 100%
- Class size
- 61 (year not confirmed)
- Centralized staffing
- No
- Offer rate
- 86.4%
- Class size
- 24 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 67 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Centralized staffing
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Proskauer Rose LLPBand 1
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 2
- Proskauer Rose LLPBand 1
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 4
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 5
- Proskauer Rose LLPBand 2
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 3
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1
- Proskauer Rose LLPBand 2
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 3
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1
- Proskauer Rose LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Proskauer Rose LLPBand 4
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 5
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.