Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP vs. Seyfarth Shaw LLP vs. Holland & Knight LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Est. 1868
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Est. 1945 · Chicago
- Holland & Knight LLP
Est. 1889 · Tampa
Est. 1868
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP is a mid-size firm of ~684 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Energy: Nuclear (Regulatory & Litigation), and Food & Beverages: Alcohol. Operates from 22 offices worldwide.
Est. 1945 · Chicago
Seyfarth Shaw LLP is a mid-size firm of ~913 attorneys, founded in Chicago, IL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Labor & Employment, and Retail. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
Est. 1889 · Tampa
Holland & Knight LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #26, founded in Tampa, FL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Construction. Operates from 37 offices worldwide.
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP#60
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP#89
- Holland & Knight LLP#48
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP#65
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP#63
- Holland & Knight LLP#26
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP7 records
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP6 records
- Holland & Knight LLP27 records
- #60
- #65
- 7 records
- Vault rank
- #89
- Am Law rank
- #63
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 6 records
- Vault rank
- #48
- Am Law rank
- #26
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 27 records
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$225,000+
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$225,000+
- Holland & Knight LLP$225,000
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$2.89M
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$1.90M
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.51M
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$939.12M
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$990.78M
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.23B
Revenue per lawyer
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$1.37M
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$1.09M
- Holland & Knight LLP$1.23M
- $225,000+
- $2.89M
- $939.12M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.37M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.90M
- Firm revenue
- $990.78M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.09M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.51M
- Firm revenue
- $2.23B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.23M
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNot Reported
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP2,000
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNot Reported
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP0.6:1
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP0.6:1
- Holland & Knight LLP0.6:1
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP~700
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP~900
- Holland & Knight LLP~2,200
Offices
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP22
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP18
- Holland & Knight LLP37
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 0.6:1
- ~700
- Offices
- 22
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~900
- Offices
- 18
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~2,200
- Offices
- 37
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP94.1%
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP86.4%
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
Class size
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP38 (year not confirmed)
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP24 (year not confirmed)
- Holland & Knight LLP57 (year not confirmed)
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPFree market
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPFree market
- Holland & Knight LLPFree market
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNo
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPYes
- Holland & Knight LLPYes
- 94.1%
- Class size
- 38 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- No
- Offer rate
- 86.4%
- Class size
- 24 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 57 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 1
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 1
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 3
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 1
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 2
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 3
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 4
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.