Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP vs. Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Est. 1868
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Est. 1924 · Atlanta
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
Est. 1868
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP is a mid-size firm of ~684 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Energy: Nuclear (Regulatory & Litigation), and Food & Beverages: Alcohol. Operates from 22 offices worldwide.
Est. 1924 · Atlanta
International platform with a large U.S. footprint across energy, litigation, corporate, tax, and insurance work.
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP#60
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP#98
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP#65
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP7 records
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP6 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- #60
- #65
- 7 records
- Vault rank
- #98
- Am Law rank
- Not Reported
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 6 records
- Vault rank
- #55
- Am Law rank
- #17
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 31 records
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$225,000+
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP$225,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$2.89M
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP$1.69M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$939.12M
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP$503.00M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
Revenue per lawyer
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$1.37M
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- $225,000+
- $2.89M
- $939.12M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.37M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.69M
- Firm revenue
- $503.00M
- Revenue per lawyer
- Not Reported
- First-Year Comp
- Varies by office
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.90M
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNot Reported
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNot Reported
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP0.6:1
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP~700
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
Offices
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP22
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP9
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 0.6:1
- ~700
- Offices
- 22
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- Not Reported
- Offices
- 9
- Billable target
- Varies by office
- Partnership track
- 9 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP94.1%
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
Class size
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP38 (year not confirmed)
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPFree market
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNo
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPCase by Case
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- 94.1%
- Class size
- 38 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- No
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 1
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 2
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPBand 4
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 3
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4 · Elite
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.