Skip to main content

Paul Hastings LLP vs. Fish & Richardson P.C. vs. Latham & Watkins LLP

Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.

+ Add firm
Rankings & prestige

  • Paul Hastings LLP#21
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.#84
  • Latham & Watkins LLP#4

  • Paul Hastings LLP#22
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.#103
  • Latham & Watkins LLP#2

  • Paul Hastings LLP21 records
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.7 records
  • Latham & Watkins LLP96 records
Compensation

  • Paul Hastings LLP$225,000
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.$225,000
  • Latham & Watkins LLP$225,000

  • Paul Hastings LLP$8.33M
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.$2.03M
  • Latham & Watkins LLP$8.65M

  • Paul Hastings LLP$2.68B
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.$556.37M
  • Latham & Watkins LLP$8.30B

Revenue per lawyer

  • Paul Hastings LLP$2.11M
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.$950
  • Latham & Watkins LLP$2.23M
Work & scale

  • Paul Hastings LLP2,000
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.Not Reported
  • Latham & Watkins LLP1,900

  • Paul Hastings LLPNot Reported
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.8 years
  • Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported

  • Paul Hastings LLP2.4:1
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.0.5:1
  • Latham & Watkins LLP2.7:1

  • Paul Hastings LLP~1,500
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.~400
  • Latham & Watkins LLP~3,700

Offices

  • Paul Hastings LLP24
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.19
  • Latham & Watkins LLP34
Summer Program

  • Paul Hastings LLP100%
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.96%
  • Latham & Watkins LLP100%

Class size

  • Paul Hastings LLP131 (year not confirmed)
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.33 (year not confirmed)
  • Latham & Watkins LLP398 (year not confirmed)

  • Paul Hastings LLPCentralized staffing
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.Free market
  • Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported

  • Paul Hastings LLPCase by Case
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.Yes
  • Latham & Watkins LLPNo
Chambers by practice, market and year

Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.

Shared rankings

Intellectual Property: Litigation · District of Columbia · 2026Band 1

Rank differences

Intellectual Property: Patent Trial and Appeal BoardNationwide · 2026
  • Paul Hastings LLPBand 1
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.Band 1
  • Latham & Watkins LLPBand 3
Intellectual PropertyNationwide · 2026
  • Paul Hastings LLPBand 2
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.Band 1
  • Latham & Watkins LLPBand 2
Intellectual Property: PatentNew York · 2026
  • Paul Hastings LLPBand 1
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.Band 4
  • Latham & Watkins LLPBand 3
Intellectual Property: Patent LitigationCalifornia · 2026
  • Paul Hastings LLPBand 3
  • Fish & Richardson P.C.Band 4
  • Latham & Watkins LLPBand 3

Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.

See which of these firms are open on the Job Board

Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.