Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP vs. Seyfarth Shaw LLP vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Est. 1863 · San Francisco
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Est. 1945 · Chicago
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
Est. 1863 · San Francisco
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #34, founded in San Francisco, CA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Capital Markets: Securitization: CLOs, Capital Markets: Securitization: CMBS, and Capital Markets:...
Est. 1945 · Chicago
Seyfarth Shaw LLP is a mid-size firm of ~913 attorneys, founded in Chicago, IL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Labor & Employment, and Retail. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP#40
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP#89
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP#34
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP#63
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP17 records
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP6 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- #40
- #34
- 17 records
- Vault rank
- #89
- Am Law rank
- #63
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 6 records
- Vault rank
- #55
- Am Law rank
- #17
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 31 records
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$225,000+
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$225,000+
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$4.20M
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$1.90M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$1.78B
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$990.78M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
Revenue per lawyer
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$1.75M
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP$1.09M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- $225,000+
- $4.20M
- $1.78B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.75M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.90M
- Firm revenue
- $990.78M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.09M
- First-Year Comp
- Varies by office
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.90M
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP1.4:1
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP0.6:1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP~1,000
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP~900
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
Offices
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP27
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP18
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 1.4:1
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 27
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~900
- Offices
- 18
- Billable target
- Varies by office
- Partnership track
- 9 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP100%
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP86.4%
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
Class size
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP24 (year not confirmed)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPFree market
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPYes
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPYes
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- 100%
- Class size
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 86.4%
- Class size
- 24 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 2
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 4
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 4
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Seyfarth Shaw LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.