Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP vs. Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. vs. UB Greensfelder
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
Est. 2013
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.
Est. 1889
- UB Greensfelder
-
Est. 2013
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #19. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Bankruptcy/Restructuring, Construction, and E-Discovery & Information Governance. Operates from 48 offices worldwide.
Est. 1889
A litigation-focused firm known for complex commercial and product matters, with additional strength in life sciences, privacy, and IP.
-
UB Greensfelder is a ~226-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction; Band 2 in Labor & Employment.
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP#57
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- UB GreensfelderNot Reported
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP#19
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.#93
- UB Greensfelder#197
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP19 records
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.12 records
- UB Greensfelder1 record
- #57
- #19
- 19 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #93
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 12 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #197
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 1 record
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$235,000
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- UB Greensfelder$225,000
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$2.06M
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.$2.32M
- UB Greensfelder$575K
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$2.84B
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.$643.39M
- UB Greensfelder$147.62M
Revenue per lawyer
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$844K
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.$1.16M
- UB Greensfelder$652K
- $235,000
- $2.06M
- $2.84B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $844K
- First-Year Comp
- Not Reported
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.32M
- Firm revenue
- $643.39M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.16M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $575K
- Firm revenue
- $147.62M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $652K
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP1,900
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- UB GreensfelderNot Reported
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP9 years
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- UB GreensfelderNot Reported
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPNot Reported
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- UB GreensfelderNot Reported
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP~3,000
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.~550
- UB Greensfelder~250
Offices
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP48
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.18
- UB Greensfelder7
- 1,900
- 9 years
- Not Reported
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 48
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~550
- Offices
- 18
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~250
- Offices
- 7
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP96%
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.100%
- UB GreensfelderNot Reported
Class size
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP127 (year not confirmed)
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.33 (2026)
- UB GreensfelderNot Reported
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPFree market
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Not Reported
- UB GreensfelderNot Reported
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPCase by Case
- Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.Yes
- UB GreensfelderNot Reported
- 96%
- Class size
- 127 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 33 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Not Reported
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.