Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP vs. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
Est. 2013
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Est. 1863 · San Francisco
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
Est. 2013
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #19. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Bankruptcy/Restructuring, Construction, and E-Discovery & Information Governance. Operates from 48 offices worldwide.
Est. 1863 · San Francisco
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #34, founded in San Francisco, CA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Capital Markets: Securitization: CLOs, Capital Markets: Securitization: CMBS, and Capital Markets:...
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP#57
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP#40
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP#19
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP#34
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP19 records
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP17 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- #57
- #19
- 19 records
- Vault rank
- #40
- Am Law rank
- #34
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 17 records
- Vault rank
- #55
- Am Law rank
- #17
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 31 records
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$235,000
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$225,000+
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$2.06M
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$4.20M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$2.84B
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$1.78B
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
Revenue per lawyer
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$844K
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$1.75M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- $235,000
- $2.06M
- $2.84B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $844K
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $4.20M
- Firm revenue
- $1.78B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.75M
- First-Year Comp
- Varies by office
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.90M
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP1,900
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP9 years
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPNot Reported
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP1.4:1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP~3,000
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP~1,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
Offices
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP48
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP27
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- 1,900
- 9 years
- Not Reported
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 48
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 1.4:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 27
- Billable target
- Varies by office
- Partnership track
- 9 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP96%
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP100%
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
Class size
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP127 (year not confirmed)
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPFree market
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPCase by Case
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPYes
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- 96%
- Class size
- 127 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.