Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
Est. 2013
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Est. 2025 · Merger
Est. 2013
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #19. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Bankruptcy/Restructuring, Construction, and E-Discovery & Information Governance. Operates from 48 offices worldwide.
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
Est. 2025 · Merger
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #33. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Corporate/Commercial, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 31 offices worldwide.
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP#57
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP#72
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP#19
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP#33
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP19 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP23 records
- #57
- #19
- 19 records
- Vault rank
- #55
- Am Law rank
- #17
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 31 records
- Vault rank
- #72
- Am Law rank
- #33
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 23 records
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$235,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$235,000+
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$2.06M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.85M
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$2.84B
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.85B
Revenue per lawyer
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP$844K
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.16M
- $235,000
- $2.06M
- $2.84B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $844K
- First-Year Comp
- Varies by office
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.90M
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- First-Year Comp
- $235,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.85M
- Firm revenue
- $1.85B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.16M
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP1,900
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP9 years
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP~3,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP~1,600
Offices
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP48
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP31
- 1,900
- 9 years
- Not Reported
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 48
- Billable target
- Varies by office
- Partnership track
- 9 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,600
- Offices
- 31
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP96%
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP94.6%
Class size
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP127 (year not confirmed)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP104 (2026)
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPFree market
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPCase by Case
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPCase by Case
- 96%
- Class size
- 127 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 94.6%
- Class size
- 104 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 4
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 5
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 4
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Norton Rose Fulbright US LLPBand 5 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 5 · Elite
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.