Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP vs. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP vs. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
Est. 1962
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Est. 1927
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Est. 1944 · Seattle
Est. 1962
Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP is a ~200-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Appellate Law, Energy: State Regulatory & Litigation, and Litigation: General Commercial.
Est. 1927
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #47. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Energy: State Regulatory & Litigation and Native American Law: Finance; Band 2 in Government Contracts. Operates from 11 offices worldwide.
Est. 1944 · Seattle
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP is a mid-size firm of ~635 attorneys, founded in Seattle, WA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Advertising: NAD Proceedings, Banking & Finance, and Corporate/M&A.
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP#29
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP#66
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP#74
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP#128
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP#47
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP#90
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP4 records
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP2 records
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP21 records
- #29
- #128
- 4 records
- Vault rank
- #66
- Am Law rank
- #47
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 2 records
- Vault rank
- #74
- Am Law rank
- #90
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 21 records
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP$225,000
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP$225,000
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$225,000+
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP$3.11M
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP$3.04M
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$1.39M
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP$369.50M
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP$1.38B
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$674.20M
Revenue per lawyer
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP$2.10M
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP$1.34M
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$1.06M
- $225,000
- $3.11M
- $369.50M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.10M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $3.04M
- Firm revenue
- $1.38B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.34M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.39M
- Firm revenue
- $674.20M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.06M
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLPNot Reported
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLPNot Reported
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP1.5:1
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP~200
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP~1,050
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP~650
Offices
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP3
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP11
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP9
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 1.5:1
- ~200
- Offices
- 3
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,050
- Offices
- 11
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~650
- Offices
- 9
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP93.3%
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP100%
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP100%
Class size
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLPNot Reported
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP65 (2026)
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP25 (2026)
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLPNot Reported
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLPNo
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLPCase by Case
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPCase by Case
- 93.3%
- Class size
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- No
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 65 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 25 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLPBand 2
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLPBand 3
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 3
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Munger, Tolles & Olson LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 4 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.