McDermott Will & Schulte LLP vs. Holland & Knight LLP vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Est. 1934
- Holland & Knight LLP
Est. 1889 · Tampa
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
Est. 1934
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #16. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Corporate/M&A & Private Equity, Corporate/M&A: Shareholder Activism, and Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation.
Est. 1889 · Tampa
Holland & Knight LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #26, founded in Tampa, FL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Construction. Operates from 37 offices worldwide.
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP#46
- Holland & Knight LLP#48
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP#16
- Holland & Knight LLP#26
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP23 records
- Holland & Knight LLP27 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- #46
- #16
- 23 records
- Vault rank
- #48
- Am Law rank
- #26
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 27 records
- Vault rank
- #55
- Am Law rank
- #17
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 31 records
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP$225,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP$5.17M
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.51M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP$2.99B
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.23B
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
Revenue per lawyer
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP$1.79M
- Holland & Knight LLP$1.23M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- Not Reported
- $5.17M
- $2.99B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.79M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.51M
- Firm revenue
- $2.23B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.23M
- First-Year Comp
- Varies by office
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.90M
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP2,000
- Holland & Knight LLP2,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP0.6:1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP~1,700
- Holland & Knight LLP~2,200
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
Offices
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP27
- Holland & Knight LLP37
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- 2,000
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- ~1,700
- Offices
- 27
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~2,200
- Offices
- 37
- Billable target
- Varies by office
- Partnership track
- 9 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP99%
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
Class size
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP75 (year not confirmed)
- Holland & Knight LLP57 (year not confirmed)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPFree market
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPYes
- Holland & Knight LLPYes
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- 99%
- Class size
- 75 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Yes
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 57 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 1
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 5
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 4
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 2
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 4
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 5
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 4
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4 · Elite
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.