Littler Mendelson P.C. vs. Jackson Lewis P.C. vs. Venable LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Littler Mendelson P.C.
Est. 1942 · San Francisco
- Jackson Lewis P.C.
Est. 1958
- Venable LLP
Est. 1900
Est. 1942 · San Francisco
Littler Mendelson P.C. is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, founded in San Francisco, CA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Labor & Employment; Band 2 in E-Discovery & Information Governance and Occupational Safety and Health. Operates from 57 offices worldwide.
Est. 1958
A national labor and employment specialist advising employers on workplace disputes, compliance, benefits, immigration, and related matters.
Est. 1900
Venable LLP is a mid-size firm of ~785 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Bankruptcy Litigation, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Construction. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
- Littler Mendelson P.C.#100
- Jackson Lewis P.C.Not Reported
- Venable LLP#69
- Littler Mendelson P.C.#62
- Jackson Lewis P.C.#79
- Venable LLP#68
- Littler Mendelson P.C.10 records
- Jackson Lewis P.C.11 records
- Venable LLP8 records
- #100
- #62
- 10 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #79
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 11 records
- Vault rank
- #69
- Am Law rank
- #68
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 8 records
- Littler Mendelson P.C.$225,000
- Jackson Lewis P.C.Not Reported
- Venable LLP$215,000
- Littler Mendelson P.C.$1.02M
- Jackson Lewis P.C.$1.02M
- Venable LLP$1.40M
- Littler Mendelson P.C.$1.03B
- Jackson Lewis P.C.$806.94M
- Venable LLP$900.01M
Revenue per lawyer
- Littler Mendelson P.C.$777K
- Jackson Lewis P.C.$753K
- Venable LLP$1.15M
- $225,000
- $1.02M
- $1.03B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $777K
- First-Year Comp
- Not Reported
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.02M
- Firm revenue
- $806.94M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $753K
- First-Year Comp
- $215,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.40M
- Firm revenue
- $900.01M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.15M
- Littler Mendelson P.C.Not Reported
- Jackson Lewis P.C.Not Reported
- Venable LLP1,850
- Littler Mendelson P.C.Not Reported
- Jackson Lewis P.C.Not Reported
- Venable LLPNot Reported
- Littler Mendelson P.C.Not Reported
- Jackson Lewis P.C.Not Reported
- Venable LLPNot Reported
- Littler Mendelson P.C.~1,300
- Jackson Lewis P.C.~1,100
- Venable LLP~800
Offices
- Littler Mendelson P.C.57
- Jackson Lewis P.C.65
- Venable LLP18
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- ~1,300
- Offices
- 57
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,100
- Offices
- 65
- Billable target
- 1,850
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~800
- Offices
- 18
- Littler Mendelson P.C.85%
- Jackson Lewis P.C.Not Reported
- Venable LLP84.6%
Class size
- Littler Mendelson P.C.33 (2026)
- Jackson Lewis P.C.Not Reported
- Venable LLP27 (year not confirmed)
- Littler Mendelson P.C.Not Reported
- Jackson Lewis P.C.Not Reported
- Venable LLPNot Reported
- Littler Mendelson P.C.No
- Jackson Lewis P.C.Not Reported
- Venable LLPNo
- 85%
- Class size
- 33 (2026)
- Not Reported
- No
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Not Reported
- Offer rate
- 84.6%
- Class size
- 27 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- No
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Littler Mendelson P.C.Band 1
- Jackson Lewis P.C.Band 2
- Venable LLPBand 3
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.