Latham & Watkins LLP vs. Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP vs. Goodwin Procter LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Latham & Watkins LLP
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Est. 1863 · San Francisco
- Goodwin Procter LLP
Est. 1912 · Boston
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
Latham & Watkins LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #4 / Am Law #2, founded in Los Angeles, CA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Antitrust: Cartel, and Appellate Law. Operates from 34 offices worldwide.
Est. 1863 · San Francisco
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #34, founded in San Francisco, CA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Capital Markets: Securitization: CLOs, Capital Markets: Securitization: CMBS, and Capital Markets:...
Est. 1912 · Boston
Goodwin Procter LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #21, founded in Boston, Massachusetts. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance: Corporate & Regulatory, Capital Markets, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
- Latham & Watkins LLP#4
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP#40
- Goodwin Procter LLP#31
- Latham & Watkins LLP#2
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP#34
- Goodwin Procter LLP#21
- Latham & Watkins LLP96 records
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP17 records
- Goodwin Procter LLP18 records
- #4
- #2
- 96 records
- Vault rank
- #40
- Am Law rank
- #34
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 17 records
- Vault rank
- #31
- Am Law rank
- #21
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 18 records
- Latham & Watkins LLP$225,000
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$225,000+
- Goodwin Procter LLP$225,000
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.65M
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$4.20M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$4.24M
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.30B
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$1.78B
- Goodwin Procter LLP$2.72B
Revenue per lawyer
- Latham & Watkins LLP$2.23M
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP$1.75M
- Goodwin Procter LLP$1.63M
- $225,000
- $8.65M
- $8.30B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.23M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $4.20M
- Firm revenue
- $1.78B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.75M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $4.24M
- Firm revenue
- $2.72B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.63M
- Latham & Watkins LLP1,900
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLP1,950
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLP2.7:1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP1.4:1
- Goodwin Procter LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLP~3,700
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP~1,000
- Goodwin Procter LLP~1,800
Offices
- Latham & Watkins LLP34
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP27
- Goodwin Procter LLP18
- 1,900
- Not Reported
- 2.7:1
- ~3,700
- Offices
- 34
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 1.4:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 27
- Billable target
- 1,950
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,800
- Offices
- 18
- Latham & Watkins LLP100%
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP100%
- Goodwin Procter LLP100%
Class size
- Latham & Watkins LLP398 (year not confirmed)
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLP67 (year not confirmed)
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPNot Reported
- Goodwin Procter LLPCentralized staffing
- Latham & Watkins LLPNo
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPYes
- Goodwin Procter LLPCase by Case
- 100%
- Class size
- 398 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- No
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 67 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Centralized staffing
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 2
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 3
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 4
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 5 · Highly Regarded
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 5 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 3
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 3
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 3
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 5
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 1
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 2
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 1
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 2
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 3
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 4
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 2
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 4
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPBand 4
- Goodwin Procter LLPBand 5
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.