Latham & Watkins LLP vs. McDermott Will & Schulte LLP vs. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Latham & Watkins LLP
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Est. 1934
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Est. 1868
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
Latham & Watkins LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #4 / Am Law #2, founded in Los Angeles, CA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Antitrust: Cartel, and Appellate Law. Operates from 34 offices worldwide.
Est. 1934
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #16. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Corporate/M&A & Private Equity, Corporate/M&A: Shareholder Activism, and Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation.
Est. 1868
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP is a mid-size firm of ~684 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Energy: Nuclear (Regulatory & Litigation), and Food & Beverages: Alcohol. Operates from 22 offices worldwide.
- Latham & Watkins LLP#4
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP#46
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP#60
- Latham & Watkins LLP#2
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP#16
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP#65
- Latham & Watkins LLP96 records
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP23 records
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP7 records
- #4
- #2
- 96 records
- Vault rank
- #46
- Am Law rank
- #16
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 23 records
- Vault rank
- #60
- Am Law rank
- #65
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 7 records
- Latham & Watkins LLP$225,000
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$225,000+
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.65M
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP$5.17M
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$2.89M
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.30B
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP$2.99B
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$939.12M
Revenue per lawyer
- Latham & Watkins LLP$2.23M
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP$1.79M
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$1.37M
- $225,000
- $8.65M
- $8.30B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.23M
- First-Year Comp
- Not Reported
- Profits Per Partner
- $5.17M
- Firm revenue
- $2.99B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.79M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.89M
- Firm revenue
- $939.12M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.37M
- Latham & Watkins LLP1,900
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP2,000
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLP2.7:1
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP0.6:1
- Latham & Watkins LLP~3,700
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP~1,700
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP~700
Offices
- Latham & Watkins LLP34
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP27
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP22
- 1,900
- Not Reported
- 2.7:1
- ~3,700
- Offices
- 34
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,700
- Offices
- 27
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~700
- Offices
- 22
- Latham & Watkins LLP100%
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP99%
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP94.1%
Class size
- Latham & Watkins LLP398 (year not confirmed)
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP75 (year not confirmed)
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP38 (year not confirmed)
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPFree market
- Latham & Watkins LLPNo
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPYes
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNo
- 100%
- Class size
- 398 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- No
- Offer rate
- 99%
- Class size
- 75 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 94.1%
- Class size
- 38 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- No
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 5 · Highly Regarded
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 3
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 3
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 4 · Highly Regarded
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 5 · Highly Regarded
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 2 · Elite
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 2
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 4
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 4
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.