Latham & Watkins LLP vs. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP vs. Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Latham & Watkins LLP
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Est. 1849
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Est. 1884
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
Latham & Watkins LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #4 / Am Law #2, founded in Los Angeles, CA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Antitrust: Cartel, and Appellate Law. Operates from 34 offices worldwide.
Est. 1849
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Vault #7 / Am Law #14. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, and Bankruptcy/Restructuring. Operates from 12 offices worldwide.
Est. 1884
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #10 / Am Law #10. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Asset Management M&A, Banking & Finance, and Capital Markets: Debt & Equity. Operates from 16 offices worldwide.
- Latham & Watkins LLP#4
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP#7
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP#10
- Latham & Watkins LLP#2
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP#14
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP#10
- Latham & Watkins LLP96 records
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP29 records
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP22 records
- #4
- #2
- 96 records
- Vault rank
- #7
- Am Law rank
- #14
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 29 records
- Vault rank
- #10
- Am Law rank
- #10
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 22 records
- Latham & Watkins LLP$225,000
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP$225,000
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP$225,000
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.65M
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP$9.80M
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP$8.57M
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.30B
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP$3.20B
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP$3.55B
Revenue per lawyer
- Latham & Watkins LLP$2.23M
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP$2.59M
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP$2.02M
- $225,000
- $8.65M
- $8.30B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.23M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $9.80M
- Firm revenue
- $3.20B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.59M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $8.57M
- Firm revenue
- $3.55B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.02M
- Latham & Watkins LLP1,900
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPNot Reported
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPNot Reported
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLP2.7:1
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP3.5:1
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP3:1
- Latham & Watkins LLP~3,700
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP~1,000
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP~2,000
Offices
- Latham & Watkins LLP34
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP12
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP16
- 1,900
- Not Reported
- 2.7:1
- ~3,700
- Offices
- 34
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 3.5:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 12
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 3:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~2,000
- Offices
- 16
- Latham & Watkins LLP100%
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP99.4%
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP100%
Class size
- Latham & Watkins LLP398 (year not confirmed)
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP220 (year not confirmed)
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP265 (year not confirmed)
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPCentralized staffing
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPCentralized staffing
- Latham & Watkins LLPNo
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPNo
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPNo
- 100%
- Class size
- 398 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- No
- Offer rate
- 99.4%
- Class size
- 220 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Centralized staffing
- Specific practice area
- No
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 265 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Centralized staffing
- Specific practice area
- No
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 4
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 5 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 2
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 2
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 2
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 2
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 1
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 2
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 2
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Davis Polk & Wardwell LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPBand 2 · Elite
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.