Kirkland & Ellis LLP vs. Mayer Brown LLP vs. Baker McKenzie LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Est. 1909
- Mayer Brown LLP
Est. 1881 · Chicago
- Baker McKenzie LLP
Est. 1949
Est. 1909
Kirkland & Ellis LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #6 / Am Law #1. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Asset Management M&A, and Banking & Finance. Operates from 27 offices worldwide.
Est. 1881 · Chicago
Mayer Brown LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #27, founded in Chicago, IL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Capital Markets: Securitization: ABS, and Capital Markets: Securitization: RMBS. Operates from 19 offices worldwide.
Est. 1949
Baker McKenzie LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #8. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Bankruptcy/Restructuring, Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation, and Immigration.
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP#6
- Mayer Brown LLP#44
- Baker McKenzie LLP#45
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP#1
- Mayer Brown LLP#27
- Baker McKenzie LLP#8
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP65 records
- Mayer Brown LLP14 records
- Baker McKenzie LLP8 records
- #6
- #1
- 65 records
- Vault rank
- #44
- Am Law rank
- #27
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 14 records
- Vault rank
- #45
- Am Law rank
- #8
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 8 records
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP$225,000
- Mayer Brown LLP$225,000
- Baker McKenzie LLP$225,000+
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP$11.12M
- Mayer Brown LLP$3.20M
- Baker McKenzie LLP$2.44M
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP$10.56B
- Mayer Brown LLP$2.17B
- Baker McKenzie LLP$3.64B
Revenue per lawyer
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP$2.55M
- Mayer Brown LLP$1.25M
- Baker McKenzie LLP$818K
- $225,000
- $11.12M
- $10.56B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.55M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $3.20M
- Firm revenue
- $2.17B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.25M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.44M
- Firm revenue
- $3.64B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $818K
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPNot Reported
- Mayer Brown LLP2,000
- Baker McKenzie LLPNot Reported
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP6 years
- Mayer Brown LLPNot Reported
- Baker McKenzie LLPNot Reported
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP1.2:1
- Mayer Brown LLP1:1
- Baker McKenzie LLPNot Reported
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP~4,150
- Mayer Brown LLP~1,750
- Baker McKenzie LLP~4,450
Offices
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP27
- Mayer Brown LLP19
- Baker McKenzie LLP9
- Not Reported
- 6 years
- 1.2:1
- ~4,150
- Offices
- 27
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 1:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,750
- Offices
- 19
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~4,450
- Offices
- 9
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPNot Reported
- Mayer Brown LLPNot Reported
- Baker McKenzie LLPNot Reported
Class size
- Kirkland & Ellis LLP957 (year not confirmed)
- Mayer Brown LLP69 (year not confirmed)
- Baker McKenzie LLPNot Reported
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPFree market
- Mayer Brown LLPFree market
- Baker McKenzie LLPCentralized staffing
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPYes
- Mayer Brown LLPCase by Case
- Baker McKenzie LLPNo
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 957 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- Yes
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 69 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Centralized staffing
- Specific practice area
- No
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 5
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 1
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 1
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 1
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 1
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 2
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 1
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 5
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 5
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 1
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 5
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 6
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 1
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 2
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 2
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 4 · Highly Regarded
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 5 · Highly Regarded
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 2
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 1
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 2
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 1
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 4
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 3
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 1
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 2
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 5
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Kirkland & Ellis LLPBand 1
- Mayer Brown LLPBand 3
- Baker McKenzie LLPBand 4
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.