King & Spalding LLP vs. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP vs. Stoel Rives
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- King & Spalding LLP
Est. 1885
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Est. 1868
- Stoel Rives
Est. 1907
Est. 1885
King & Spalding LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #23. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Accountant and Auditor Liability, Antitrust, and Banking & Finance. Operates from 26 offices worldwide.
Est. 1868
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP is a mid-size firm of ~684 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Energy: Nuclear (Regulatory & Litigation), and Food & Beverages: Alcohol. Operates from 22 offices worldwide.
Est. 1907
Stoel Rives is a ~321-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Corporate/Commercial, and Corporate/M&A.
- King & Spalding LLP#36
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP#60
- Stoel RivesNot Reported
- King & Spalding LLP#23
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP#65
- Stoel Rives#139
- King & Spalding LLP25 records
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP7 records
- Stoel Rives19 records
- #36
- #23
- 25 records
- Vault rank
- #60
- Am Law rank
- #65
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 7 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #139
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 19 records
- King & Spalding LLP$225,000
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$225,000+
- Stoel Rives$225,000
- King & Spalding LLP$7.26M
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$2.89M
- Stoel Rives$1.44M
- King & Spalding LLP$2.48B
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$939.12M
- Stoel Rives$317.38M
Revenue per lawyer
- King & Spalding LLP$1.79M
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$1.37M
- Stoel Rives$990K
- $225,000
- $7.26M
- $2.48B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.79M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.89M
- Firm revenue
- $939.12M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.37M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.44M
- Firm revenue
- $317.38M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $990K
- King & Spalding LLPNot Reported
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNot Reported
- Stoel RivesNot Reported
- King & Spalding LLPNot Reported
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNot Reported
- Stoel RivesNot Reported
- King & Spalding LLP1:1
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP0.6:1
- Stoel RivesNot Reported
- King & Spalding LLP~1,400
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP~700
- Stoel Rives~300
Offices
- King & Spalding LLP26
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP22
- Stoel Rives9
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 1:1
- ~1,400
- Offices
- 26
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~700
- Offices
- 22
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~300
- Offices
- 9
- King & Spalding LLP100%
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP94.1%
- Stoel RivesNot Reported
Class size
- King & Spalding LLP107 (year not confirmed)
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP38 (year not confirmed)
- Stoel Rives20 (2025)
- King & Spalding LLPNot Reported
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPFree market
- Stoel RivesNot Reported
- King & Spalding LLPCase by Case
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPNo
- Stoel RivesYes
- 100%
- Class size
- 107 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 94.1%
- Class size
- 38 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- No
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 20 (2025)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- King & Spalding LLPBand 1
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 4
- Stoel RivesBand 5
- King & Spalding LLPBand 3
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLPBand 4
- Stoel RivesBand 5
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.