Holland & Knight LLP vs. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP vs. Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Holland & Knight LLP
Est. 1889 · Tampa
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Est. 2011 · Merger
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Est. 1924 · Atlanta
Est. 1889 · Tampa
Holland & Knight LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #26, founded in Tampa, FL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Construction. Operates from 37 offices worldwide.
Est. 2011 · Merger
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP is a mid-size firm of ~650 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation, and Intellectual Property. Operates from 22 offices worldwide.
Est. 1924 · Atlanta
International platform with a large U.S. footprint across energy, litigation, corporate, tax, and insurance work.
- Holland & Knight LLP#48
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP#97
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP#98
- Holland & Knight LLP#26
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP#95
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP27 records
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP7 records
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP6 records
- #48
- #26
- 27 records
- Vault rank
- #97
- Am Law rank
- #95
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 7 records
- Vault rank
- #98
- Am Law rank
- Not Reported
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 6 records
- Holland & Knight LLP$225,000
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP$215,000
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP$225,000
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.51M
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP$1.88M
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP$1.69M
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.23B
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP$630.11M
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP$503.00M
Revenue per lawyer
- Holland & Knight LLP$1.23M
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP$1.07M
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- $225,000
- $2.51M
- $2.23B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.23M
- First-Year Comp
- $215,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.88M
- Firm revenue
- $630.11M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.07M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.69M
- Firm revenue
- $503.00M
- Revenue per lawyer
- Not Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP2,000
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPNot Reported
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPNot Reported
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP0.6:1
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPNot Reported
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP~2,200
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP~650
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
Offices
- Holland & Knight LLP37
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP22
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP9
- 2,000
- Not Reported
- 0.6:1
- ~2,200
- Offices
- 37
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~650
- Offices
- 22
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- Not Reported
- Offices
- 9
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPNot Reported
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
Class size
- Holland & Knight LLP57 (year not confirmed)
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP38 (year not confirmed)
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPFree market
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPNot Reported
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPYes
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPYes
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPCase by Case
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 57 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- Yes
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 38 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPBand 4
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPBand 2
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPBand 3
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPBand 4
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPBand 2
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPBand 2
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPBand 4
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPBand 2
- Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLPBand 2
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.