Holland & Knight LLP vs. Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP vs. McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Holland & Knight LLP
Est. 1889 · Tampa
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Est. 1870 · Birmingham
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Est. 1934
Est. 1889 · Tampa
Holland & Knight LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #26, founded in Tampa, FL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Construction. Operates from 37 offices worldwide.
Est. 1870 · Birmingham
A full-service Southeastern firm with substantial banking, corporate, litigation, construction, and real-estate capabilities.
Est. 1934
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #16. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Corporate/M&A & Private Equity, Corporate/M&A: Shareholder Activism, and Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation.
- Holland & Knight LLP#48
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPNot Reported
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP#46
- Holland & Knight LLP#26
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP#100
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP#16
- Holland & Knight LLP27 records
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP23 records
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP23 records
- #48
- #26
- 27 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #100
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 23 records
- Vault rank
- #46
- Am Law rank
- #16
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 23 records
- Holland & Knight LLP$225,000
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPNot Reported
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.51M
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP$1.01M
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP$5.17M
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.23B
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP$567.87M
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP$2.99B
Revenue per lawyer
- Holland & Knight LLP$1.23M
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP$793K
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP$1.79M
- $225,000
- $2.51M
- $2.23B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.23M
- First-Year Comp
- Not Reported
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.01M
- Firm revenue
- $567.87M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $793K
- First-Year Comp
- Not Reported
- Profits Per Partner
- $5.17M
- Firm revenue
- $2.99B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.79M
- Holland & Knight LLP2,000
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPNot Reported
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP2,000
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPNot Reported
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP0.6:1
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPNot Reported
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP~2,200
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP~750
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP~1,700
Offices
- Holland & Knight LLP37
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP13
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP27
- 2,000
- Not Reported
- 0.6:1
- ~2,200
- Offices
- 37
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~750
- Offices
- 13
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,700
- Offices
- 27
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPNot Reported
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP99%
Class size
- Holland & Knight LLP57 (year not confirmed)
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPNot Reported
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLP75 (year not confirmed)
- Holland & Knight LLPFree market
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPNot Reported
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPYes
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPYes
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPYes
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 57 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- Yes
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 99%
- Class size
- 75 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 1
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPBand 1
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPBand 3
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 1
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPBand 4 · Elite
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 4
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPBand 5
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 5
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPBand 4 · Highly Regarded
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.