Haynes and Boone, LLP vs. Troutman Pepper Locke LLP vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Haynes and Boone, LLP
Est. 1970
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Est. 2025 · Merger
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
Est. 1970
Haynes and Boone, LLP is a mid-size firm of ~669 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Bankruptcy/Restructuring, Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation, and Environment. Operates from 25 offices worldwide.
Est. 2025 · Merger
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #33. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Corporate/Commercial, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 31 offices worldwide.
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
- Haynes and Boone, LLP#81
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP#72
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Haynes and Boone, LLP#85
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP#33
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Haynes and Boone, LLP7 records
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP23 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- #81
- #85
- 7 records
- Vault rank
- #72
- Am Law rank
- #33
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 23 records
- Vault rank
- #55
- Am Law rank
- #17
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 31 records
- Haynes and Boone, LLP$225,000
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$235,000+
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Haynes and Boone, LLP$1.68M
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.85M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Haynes and Boone, LLP$749.32M
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.85B
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
Revenue per lawyer
- Haynes and Boone, LLP$1.12M
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.16M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- $225,000
- $1.68M
- $749.32M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.12M
- First-Year Comp
- $235,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.85M
- Firm revenue
- $1.85B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.16M
- First-Year Comp
- Varies by office
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.90M
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- Haynes and Boone, LLPNot Reported
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Haynes and Boone, LLP8 years
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Haynes and Boone, LLP0.7:1
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Haynes and Boone, LLP~650
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP~1,600
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
Offices
- Haynes and Boone, LLP25
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP31
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Not Reported
- 8 years
- 0.7:1
- ~650
- Offices
- 25
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,600
- Offices
- 31
- Billable target
- Varies by office
- Partnership track
- 9 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Haynes and Boone, LLP100%
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP94.6%
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
Class size
- Haynes and Boone, LLP52 (year not confirmed)
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP104 (2026)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Haynes and Boone, LLPFree market
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Haynes and Boone, LLPCase by Case
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPCase by Case
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- 100%
- Class size
- 52 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 94.6%
- Class size
- 104 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Haynes and Boone, LLPBand 1
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Haynes and Boone, LLPBand 2
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- Haynes and Boone, LLPBand 2
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 5
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
- Haynes and Boone, LLPBand 2
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
- Haynes and Boone, LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 5 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.