Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP vs. Holland & Knight LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Est. 2014 · Merger
- Holland & Knight LLP
Est. 1889 · Tampa
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
Est. 2014 · Merger
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #45. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Bankruptcy/Restructuring, Corporate/M&A, and Environment. Operates from 47 offices worldwide.
Est. 1889 · Tampa
Holland & Knight LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #26, founded in Tampa, FL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Construction. Operates from 37 offices worldwide.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP#82
- Holland & Knight LLP#48
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP#45
- Holland & Knight LLP#26
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP8 records
- Holland & Knight LLP27 records
- #55
- #17
- 31 records
- Vault rank
- #82
- Am Law rank
- #45
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 8 records
- Vault rank
- #48
- Am Law rank
- #26
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 27 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP$200,000
- Holland & Knight LLP$225,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP$2.51M
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.51M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP$1.42B
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.23B
Revenue per lawyer
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP$1.00M
- Holland & Knight LLP$1.23M
- Varies by office
- $2.90M
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- First-Year Comp
- $200,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.51M
- Firm revenue
- $1.42B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.00M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.51M
- Firm revenue
- $2.23B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.23M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP2,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP0.6:1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP~1,400
- Holland & Knight LLP~2,200
Offices
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP47
- Holland & Knight LLP37
- Varies by office
- 9 years
- 0.7:1
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,400
- Offices
- 47
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~2,200
- Offices
- 37
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
Class size
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP57 (year not confirmed)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPFree market
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNo
- Holland & Knight LLPYes
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- No
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 57 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPBand 4
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPBand 1
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.