Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Snell & Wilmer vs. Fennemore Craig
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
- Snell & Wilmer
Est. 1938
- Fennemore Craig
Est. 1885 · Phoenix
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
Est. 1938
Snell & Wilmer is a mid-size firm of ~550 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation, and Intellectual Property. Operates from 18 offices worldwide.
Est. 1885 · Phoenix
Fennemore Craig is a ~369-attorney firm, founded in Phoenix. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 2 in Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation and Real Estate. Operates from 21 offices worldwide.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Snell & WilmerNot Reported
- Fennemore CraigNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Snell & Wilmer#109
- Fennemore Craig#171
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- Snell & Wilmer7 records
- Fennemore CraigNot Reported
- #55
- #17
- 31 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #109
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 7 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #171
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- Not Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Snell & Wilmer$225,000
- Fennemore Craig$225,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Snell & Wilmer$1.56M
- Fennemore Craig$584K
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
- Snell & Wilmer$473.97M
- Fennemore Craig$218.69M
Revenue per lawyer
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- Snell & Wilmer$957K
- Fennemore Craig$593K
- Varies by office
- $2.90M
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.56M
- Firm revenue
- $473.97M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $957K
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $584K
- Firm revenue
- $218.69M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $593K
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Snell & WilmerNot Reported
- Fennemore CraigNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Snell & WilmerNot Reported
- Fennemore CraigNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Snell & WilmerNot Reported
- Fennemore CraigNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
- Snell & Wilmer~550
- Fennemore Craig~350
Offices
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Snell & Wilmer18
- Fennemore Craig21
- Varies by office
- 9 years
- 0.7:1
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~550
- Offices
- 18
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~350
- Offices
- 21
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
- Snell & Wilmer100%
- Fennemore CraigNot Reported
Class size
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Snell & WilmerNot Reported
- Fennemore CraigNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Snell & WilmerNot Reported
- Fennemore CraigNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- Snell & WilmerYes
- Fennemore CraigYes
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Snell & WilmerBand 1
- Fennemore CraigBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- Snell & WilmerBand 2
- Fennemore CraigBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Snell & WilmerBand 2
- Fennemore CraigBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
- Snell & WilmerBand 2
- Fennemore CraigBand 3
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.