Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Phelps Dunbar vs. Adams and Reese
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
- Phelps Dunbar
-
- Adams and Reese
Est. 1951
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
-
Phelps Dunbar is a ~425-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Energy & Natural Resources, and Gaming & Licensing. Operates from 17 offices worldwide.
Est. 1951
Adams and Reese is a ~265-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Government Relations: State & Local, and Insurance. Operates from 20 offices worldwide.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Phelps DunbarNot Reported
- Adams and ReeseNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Phelps Dunbar#157
- Adams and Reese#177
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- Phelps Dunbar13 records
- Adams and Reese6 records
- #55
- #17
- 31 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #157
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 13 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #177
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 6 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Phelps Dunbar$225,000
- Adams and Reese$225,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Phelps Dunbar$699K
- Adams and Reese$841K
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
- Phelps Dunbar$254.19M
- Adams and Reese$186.47M
Revenue per lawyer
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- Phelps Dunbar$599K
- Adams and Reese$703K
- Varies by office
- $2.90M
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $699K
- Firm revenue
- $254.19M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $599K
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $841K
- Firm revenue
- $186.47M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $703K
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Phelps DunbarNot Reported
- Adams and ReeseNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Phelps DunbarNot Reported
- Adams and ReeseNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Phelps DunbarNot Reported
- Adams and ReeseNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
- Phelps Dunbar~450
- Adams and Reese~250
Offices
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Phelps Dunbar17
- Adams and Reese20
- Varies by office
- 9 years
- 0.7:1
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~450
- Offices
- 17
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~250
- Offices
- 20
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
- Phelps DunbarNot Reported
- Adams and ReeseNot Reported
Class size
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Phelps DunbarNot Reported
- Adams and ReeseNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Phelps DunbarNot Reported
- Adams and ReeseNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- Phelps DunbarYes
- Adams and ReeseYes
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Phelps DunbarBand 3
- Adams and ReeseBand 4
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Phelps DunbarBand 5
- Adams and ReeseBand 5
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.