Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Kobre & Kim vs. Holland & Knight LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
- Kobre & Kim
-
- Holland & Knight LLP
Est. 1889 · Tampa
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
-
Kobre & Kim is a ~110-attorney boutique. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations; Band 2 in Intellectual Property: Trade Secrets. Operates from 15 offices worldwide.
Est. 1889 · Tampa
Holland & Knight LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #26, founded in Tampa, FL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Construction. Operates from 37 offices worldwide.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Kobre & KimNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP#48
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Kobre & Kim#165
- Holland & Knight LLP#26
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- Kobre & Kim1 record
- Holland & Knight LLP27 records
- #55
- #17
- 31 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #165
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 1 record
- Vault rank
- #48
- Am Law rank
- #26
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 27 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Kobre & Kim$225,000
- Holland & Knight LLP$225,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Kobre & Kim$2.39M
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.51M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
- Kobre & Kim$235.01M
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.23B
Revenue per lawyer
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- Kobre & Kim$2.13M
- Holland & Knight LLP$1.23M
- Varies by office
- $2.90M
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.39M
- Firm revenue
- $235.01M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.13M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.51M
- Firm revenue
- $2.23B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.23M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Kobre & KimNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP2,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Kobre & KimNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Kobre & KimNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP0.6:1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
- Kobre & Kim~100
- Holland & Knight LLP~2,200
Offices
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Kobre & Kim15
- Holland & Knight LLP37
- Varies by office
- 9 years
- 0.7:1
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~100
- Offices
- 15
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~2,200
- Offices
- 37
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
- Kobre & KimNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
Class size
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Kobre & KimNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLP57 (year not confirmed)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Kobre & KimNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPFree market
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- Kobre & KimNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPYes
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Not Reported
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 57 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- Kobre & KimBand 1
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.