Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Holland & Knight LLP vs. Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
- Holland & Knight LLP
Est. 1889 · Tampa
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Est. 2025 · Merger
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
Est. 1889 · Tampa
Holland & Knight LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #26, founded in Tampa, FL. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Construction. Operates from 37 offices worldwide.
Est. 2025 · Merger
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #33. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Corporate/Commercial, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 31 offices worldwide.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Holland & Knight LLP#48
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP#72
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Holland & Knight LLP#26
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP#33
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- Holland & Knight LLP27 records
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP23 records
- #55
- #17
- 31 records
- Vault rank
- #48
- Am Law rank
- #26
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 27 records
- Vault rank
- #72
- Am Law rank
- #33
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 23 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Holland & Knight LLP$225,000
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$235,000+
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.51M
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.85M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
- Holland & Knight LLP$2.23B
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.85B
Revenue per lawyer
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- Holland & Knight LLP$1.23M
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP$1.16M
- Varies by office
- $2.90M
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.51M
- Firm revenue
- $2.23B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.23M
- First-Year Comp
- $235,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.85M
- Firm revenue
- $1.85B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.16M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Holland & Knight LLP2,000
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Holland & Knight LLP0.6:1
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
- Holland & Knight LLP~2,200
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP~1,600
Offices
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Holland & Knight LLP37
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP31
- Varies by office
- 9 years
- 0.7:1
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.6:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~2,200
- Offices
- 37
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,600
- Offices
- 31
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
- Holland & Knight LLPNot Reported
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP94.6%
Class size
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Holland & Knight LLP57 (year not confirmed)
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLP104 (2026)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Holland & Knight LLPFree market
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- Holland & Knight LLPYes
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPCase by Case
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 57 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Free market
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 94.6%
- Class size
- 104 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 1
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 4
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 2
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 4
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 4
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 4
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 4
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 3
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 4
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Holland & Knight LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Troutman Pepper Locke LLPBand 5 · Elite
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.