Greenberg Traurig, LLP vs. Hogan Lovells Cadwalader vs. Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Est. 2026 · Merger
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Est. 2020 · Merger
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
Est. 2026 · Merger
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #12. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Capital Markets: Securitization: CMBS, Capital Markets: Securitization: CRE CLOs, and Corporate/M&A. Operates from 48 offices worldwide.
Est. 2020 · Merger
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, and Capital Markets: Debt & Equity. Operates from 20 offices worldwide.
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader#30
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP#85
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader#12
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP#56
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader27 records
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP22 records
- #55
- #17
- 31 records
- Vault rank
- #30
- Am Law rank
- #12
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 27 records
- Vault rank
- #85
- Am Law rank
- #56
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 22 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader$225,000+
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$225,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader$3.52M
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$1.61M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader$3.29B
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$1.19B
Revenue per lawyer
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader$1.21M
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$1.16M
- Varies by office
- $2.90M
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $3.52M
- Firm revenue
- $3.29B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.21M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.61M
- Firm revenue
- $1.19B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.16M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerNot Reported
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1,900
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerNot Reported
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerNot Reported
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP0.8:1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader~3,100
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP~1,200
Offices
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader48
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP20
- Varies by office
- 9 years
- 0.7:1
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,100
- Offices
- 48
- Billable target
- 1,900
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.8:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,200
- Offices
- 20
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader98.7%
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP98.5%
Class size
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Hogan Lovells Cadwalader64 (year not confirmed)
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP72 (year not confirmed)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerNot Reported
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerNo
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPCase by Case
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 98.7%
- Class size
- 64 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- No
- Offer rate
- 98.5%
- Class size
- 72 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 1
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 1
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 1 · Elite
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 2
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 5
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 2
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 2
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 5
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 2 · Elite
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 2 · Elite
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 4
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 3
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 5
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 3
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 5
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Hogan Lovells CadwaladerBand 3 · Elite
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.