Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP vs. Latham & Watkins LLP vs. O'Melveny & Myers LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Est. 1890
- Latham & Watkins LLP
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP
Est. 1885
Est. 1890
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #8 / Am Law #4. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Accountant and Auditor Liability, Antitrust, and Antitrust: Cartel. Operates from 22 offices worldwide.
Est. 1934 · Los Angeles
Latham & Watkins LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Vault #4 / Am Law #2, founded in Los Angeles, CA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Antitrust: Cartel, and Appellate Law. Operates from 34 offices worldwide.
Est. 1885
O'Melveny & Myers LLP is a mid-size firm of ~778 attorneys. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in ERISA Litigation, Energy: State Regulatory & Litigation (Electricity), and Intellectual Property: Trade Secrets.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP#8
- Latham & Watkins LLP#4
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP#28
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP#4
- Latham & Watkins LLP#2
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP#57
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP48 records
- Latham & Watkins LLP96 records
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP5 records
- #8
- #4
- 48 records
- Vault rank
- #4
- Am Law rank
- #2
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 96 records
- Vault rank
- #28
- Am Law rank
- #57
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 5 records
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP$225,000
- Latham & Watkins LLP$225,000
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP$225,000+
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP$8.89M
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.65M
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP$3.46M
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP$4.21B
- Latham & Watkins LLP$8.30B
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP$1.17B
Revenue per lawyer
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP$2.04M
- Latham & Watkins LLP$2.23M
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP$1.50M
- $225,000
- $8.89M
- $4.21B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.04M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $8.65M
- Firm revenue
- $8.30B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.23M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $3.46M
- Firm revenue
- $1.17B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.50M
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLP1,900
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPNot Reported
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPNot Reported
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPNot Reported
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP1.6:1
- Latham & Watkins LLP2.7:1
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP2.2:1
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP~2,200
- Latham & Watkins LLP~3,700
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP~800
Offices
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP22
- Latham & Watkins LLP34
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP9
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 1.6:1
- ~2,200
- Offices
- 22
- Billable target
- 1,900
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 2.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,700
- Offices
- 34
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 2.2:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~800
- Offices
- 9
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP97%
- Latham & Watkins LLP100%
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP98.4%
Class size
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP156 (year not confirmed)
- Latham & Watkins LLP398 (year not confirmed)
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP60 (year not confirmed)
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFree market
- Latham & Watkins LLPNot Reported
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPNot Reported
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPNo
- Latham & Watkins LLPNo
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPNo
- 97%
- Class size
- 156 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- No
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 398 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- No
- Offer rate
- 98.4%
- Class size
- 60 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- No
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 2
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 5
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 4
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 2
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 3 · Elite
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 3
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 3
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 1 · Elite
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 5 · Elite
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPBand 1
- Latham & Watkins LLPBand 2
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPBand 1
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.