Fish & Richardson P.C. vs. Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP vs. Robins Kaplan
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Fish & Richardson P.C.
Est. 1878 · Boston
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Est. 2020 · Merger
- Robins Kaplan
Est. 1938
Est. 1878 · Boston
Fish & Richardson P.C. is a ~400-attorney firm, founded in Boston. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property: Litigation, and Intellectual Property: Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Operates from 19 offices worldwide.
Est. 2020 · Merger
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, and Capital Markets: Debt & Equity. Operates from 20 offices worldwide.
Est. 1938
Robins Kaplan is a ~185-attorney boutique. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and Litigation: General Commercial.
- Fish & Richardson P.C.#84
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP#85
- Robins KaplanNot Reported
- Fish & Richardson P.C.#103
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP#56
- Robins Kaplan#191
- Fish & Richardson P.C.7 records
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP22 records
- Robins Kaplan4 records
- #84
- #103
- 7 records
- Vault rank
- #85
- Am Law rank
- #56
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 22 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #191
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 4 records
- Fish & Richardson P.C.$225,000
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$225,000
- Robins Kaplan$225,000
- Fish & Richardson P.C.$2.03M
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$1.61M
- Robins Kaplan$1.05M
- Fish & Richardson P.C.$556.37M
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$1.19B
- Robins Kaplan$154.70M
Revenue per lawyer
- Fish & Richardson P.C.$950
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP$1.16M
- Robins Kaplan$838K
- $225,000
- $2.03M
- $556.37M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $950
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.61M
- Firm revenue
- $1.19B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.16M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.05M
- Firm revenue
- $154.70M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $838K
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Not Reported
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1,900
- Robins KaplanNot Reported
- Fish & Richardson P.C.8 years
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPNot Reported
- Robins KaplanNot Reported
- Fish & Richardson P.C.0.5:1
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP0.8:1
- Robins KaplanNot Reported
- Fish & Richardson P.C.~400
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP~1,200
- Robins Kaplan~200
Offices
- Fish & Richardson P.C.19
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP20
- Robins Kaplan7
- Not Reported
- 8 years
- 0.5:1
- ~400
- Offices
- 19
- Billable target
- 1,900
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 0.8:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,200
- Offices
- 20
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~200
- Offices
- 7
- Fish & Richardson P.C.96%
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP98.5%
- Robins KaplanNot Reported
Class size
- Fish & Richardson P.C.33 (year not confirmed)
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP72 (year not confirmed)
- Robins KaplanNot Reported
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Free market
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPNot Reported
- Robins KaplanNot Reported
- Fish & Richardson P.C.Yes
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPCase by Case
- Robins KaplanYes
- 96%
- Class size
- 33 (year not confirmed)
- Free market
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 98.5%
- Class size
- 72 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.