Dorsey & Whitney LLP vs. Jones Day vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Est. 1912
- Jones Day
Est. 1893 · Cleveland
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
Est. 1912
A full-service firm with Upper Midwest roots and a broad corporate, finance, litigation, energy, and intellectual-property practice.
Est. 1893 · Cleveland
Jones Day is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #15, founded in Cleveland, OH. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Appellate Law, and Banking & Finance. Operates from 42 offices worldwide.
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPNot Reported
- Jones Day#26
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP#99
- Jones Day#15
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP14 records
- Jones Day22 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- Not Reported
- #99
- 14 records
- Vault rank
- #26
- Am Law rank
- #15
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 22 records
- Vault rank
- #55
- Am Law rank
- #17
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 31 records
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP$190,000
- Jones Day$240,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP$1.35M
- Jones Day$1.73M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP$578.28M
- Jones Day$3.08B
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
Revenue per lawyer
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP$1.02M
- Jones Day$1.26M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- $190,000
- $1.35M
- $578.28M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.02M
- First-Year Comp
- $240,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.73M
- Firm revenue
- $3.08B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.26M
- First-Year Comp
- Varies by office
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.90M
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPNot Reported
- Jones Day2,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPNot Reported
- Jones DayNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPNot Reported
- Jones Day1.3:1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP~600
- Jones Day~2,450
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
Offices
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP22
- Jones Day42
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- ~600
- Offices
- 22
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- 1.3:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~2,450
- Offices
- 42
- Billable target
- Varies by office
- Partnership track
- 9 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPNot Reported
- Jones Day98.4%
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
Class size
- Dorsey & Whitney LLP37 (year not confirmed)
- Jones Day189 (year not confirmed)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPNot Reported
- Jones DayNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPYes
- Jones DayNo
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 37 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 98.4%
- Class size
- 189 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- No
- Offer rate
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPBand 1
- Jones DayBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPBand 5 · Highly Regarded
- Jones DayBand 5 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.