DLA Piper LLP (US) vs. Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- DLA Piper LLP (US)
Est. 2005 · Merger
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP
Est. 1912
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
Est. 2005 · Merger
DLA Piper LLP (US) is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #3. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Artificial Intelligence, Corporate/M&A, and Franchising. Operates from 89 offices worldwide.
Est. 1912
Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP is Vault #24. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, and Construction. Operates from 48 offices worldwide.
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
- DLA Piper LLP (US)#42
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP#24
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- DLA Piper LLP (US)#3
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP#51
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- DLA Piper LLP (US)22 records
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP25 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- #42
- #3
- 22 records
- Vault rank
- #24
- Am Law rank
- #51
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 25 records
- Vault rank
- #55
- Am Law rank
- #17
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 31 records
- DLA Piper LLP (US)$225,000+
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$255,000+
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- DLA Piper LLP (US)$4.14M
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$1.99M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- DLA Piper LLP (US)$4.58B
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$1.28B
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
Revenue per lawyer
- DLA Piper LLP (US)$968K
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$1.26M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- $225,000+
- $4.14M
- $4.58B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $968K
- First-Year Comp
- $255,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.99M
- Firm revenue
- $1.28B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.26M
- First-Year Comp
- Varies by office
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.90M
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Not Reported
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP2,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Not Reported
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Not Reported
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- DLA Piper LLP (US)~4,750
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
Offices
- DLA Piper LLP (US)89
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP48
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- ~4,750
- Offices
- 89
- Billable target
- 2,000
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- Not Reported
- Offices
- 48
- Billable target
- Varies by office
- Partnership track
- 9 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- DLA Piper LLP (US)96.9%
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP100%
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
Class size
- DLA Piper LLP (US)131 (2026)
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP38 (year not confirmed)
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Not Reported
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Yes
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPYes
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- 96.9%
- Class size
- 131 (2026)
- Not Reported
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 38 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 1
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 4
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 1
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 3
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 1 · Elite
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3 · Elite
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 5
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 2
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 2 · Elite
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 4 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Highly Regarded
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 2
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 2
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 3
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 2 · Elite
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 2 · Elite
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4 · Elite
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 2
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 3
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 5
- DLA Piper LLP (US)Band 3
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 5
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 4
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.