Davis Wright Tremaine LLP vs. Loeb & Loeb vs. Pryor Cashman
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Est. 1944 · Seattle
- Loeb & Loeb
Est. 1909
- Pryor Cashman
-
Est. 1944 · Seattle
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP is a mid-size firm of ~635 attorneys, founded in Seattle, WA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Advertising: NAD Proceedings, Banking & Finance, and Corporate/M&A.
Est. 1909
Loeb & Loeb is a ~446-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Advertising: NAD Proceedings, Advertising: Transactional & Regulatory, and Media & Entertainment.
-
Pryor Cashman is a ~220-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Media & Entertainment and Media & Entertainment: Litigation; Band 2 in Immigration.
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP#74
- Loeb & LoebNot Reported
- Pryor CashmanNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP#90
- Loeb & Loeb#108
- Pryor Cashman#169
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP21 records
- Loeb & Loeb6 records
- Pryor Cashman2 records
- #74
- #90
- 21 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #108
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 6 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #169
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 2 records
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$225,000+
- Loeb & Loeb$225,000
- Pryor Cashman$225,000
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$1.39M
- Loeb & Loeb$2.44M
- Pryor Cashman$1.65M
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$674.20M
- Loeb & Loeb$501.98M
- Pryor Cashman$222.98M
Revenue per lawyer
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$1.06M
- Loeb & Loeb$1.13M
- Pryor Cashman$1.01M
- $225,000+
- $1.39M
- $674.20M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.06M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.44M
- Firm revenue
- $501.98M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.13M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.65M
- Firm revenue
- $222.98M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.01M
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Loeb & LoebNot Reported
- Pryor CashmanNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Loeb & LoebNot Reported
- Pryor CashmanNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Loeb & LoebNot Reported
- Pryor CashmanNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP~650
- Loeb & Loeb~450
- Pryor Cashman~200
Offices
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP9
- Loeb & Loeb9
- Pryor Cashman3
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- ~650
- Offices
- 9
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~450
- Offices
- 9
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~200
- Offices
- 3
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP100%
- Loeb & LoebNot Reported
- Pryor CashmanNot Reported
Class size
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP25 (2026)
- Loeb & Loeb5 (2025)
- Pryor CashmanNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Loeb & LoebNot Reported
- Pryor CashmanNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPCase by Case
- Loeb & LoebNot Reported
- Pryor CashmanYes
- 100%
- Class size
- 25 (2026)
- Not Reported
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- 5 (2025)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Not Reported
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 2
- Loeb & LoebBand 1
- Pryor CashmanBand 4
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.