Cozen O'Connor P.C. vs. Shutts & Bowen vs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.
Est. 1970 · Philadelphia
- Shutts & Bowen
Est. 1910
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Est. 1967
Est. 1970 · Philadelphia
Cozen O'Connor P.C. is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, founded in Philadelphia, PA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Construction, Energy & Natural Resources, and Higher Education. Operates from 34 offices worldwide.
Est. 1910
Shutts & Bowen is a ~280-attorney firm. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance and Intellectual Property; Band 2 in Construction.
Est. 1967
Greenberg Traurig, LLP is a 2,000-plus-attorney global firm, Am Law #17. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance, Construction, and Corporate/Commercial. Operates from 52 offices worldwide.
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.#88
- Shutts & BowenNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#55
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.#80
- Shutts & Bowen#170
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP#17
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.10 records
- Shutts & Bowen2 records
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP31 records
- #88
- #80
- 10 records
- Vault rank
- Not Reported
- Am Law rank
- #170
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 2 records
- Vault rank
- #55
- Am Law rank
- #17
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 31 records
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.$180,000 - $215,000
- Shutts & Bowen$225,000
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.$1.29M
- Shutts & Bowen$1.12M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.90M
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.$803.00M
- Shutts & Bowen$221.19M
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$2.91B
Revenue per lawyer
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.$949K
- Shutts & Bowen$821K
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP$1.04M
- $180,000 - $215,000
- $1.29M
- $803.00M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $949K
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.12M
- Firm revenue
- $221.19M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $821K
- First-Year Comp
- Varies by office
- Profits Per Partner
- $2.90M
- Firm revenue
- $2.91B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.04M
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Not Reported
- Shutts & BowenNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPVaries by office
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Not Reported
- Shutts & BowenNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP9 years
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.0.5:1
- Shutts & BowenNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP0.7:1
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.~1,000
- Shutts & Bowen~300
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP~3,000
Offices
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.34
- Shutts & Bowen8
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP52
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- 0.5:1
- ~1,000
- Offices
- 34
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~300
- Offices
- 8
- Billable target
- Varies by office
- Partnership track
- 9 years
- US associates per partner
- 0.7:1
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~3,000
- Offices
- 52
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.96.6%
- Shutts & BowenNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP95%
Class size
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.14 (year not confirmed)
- Shutts & BowenNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLP92 (year not confirmed)
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Not Reported
- Shutts & BowenNot Reported
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPNot Reported
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.No
- Shutts & BowenYes
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPCase by Case
- 96.6%
- Class size
- 14 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- No
- Offer rate
- Not Reported
- Class size
- Not Reported
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 95%
- Class size
- 92 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Band 1
- Shutts & BowenBand 1
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Band 3 · Highly Regarded
- Shutts & BowenBand 2 · Highly Regarded
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 1 · Elite
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.Band 5
- Shutts & BowenBand 2
- Greenberg Traurig, LLPBand 2
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.