Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP vs. K&L Gates LLP vs. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP
Est. 1912
- K&L Gates LLP
Est. 2007 · Merger
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Est. 1944 · Seattle
Est. 1912
Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP is Vault #24. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, and Construction. Operates from 48 offices worldwide.
Est. 2007 · Merger
K&L Gates LLP is a 1,000-plus-attorney firm, Am Law #48. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Banking & Finance: Corporate & Regulatory, Bankruptcy/Restructuring, and Construction. Operates from 45 offices worldwide.
Est. 1944 · Seattle
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP is a mid-size firm of ~635 attorneys, founded in Seattle, WA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Advertising: NAD Proceedings, Banking & Finance, and Corporate/M&A.
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP#24
- K&L Gates LLP#49
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP#74
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP#51
- K&L Gates LLP#48
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP#90
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP25 records
- K&L Gates LLP14 records
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP21 records
- #24
- #51
- 25 records
- Vault rank
- #49
- Am Law rank
- #48
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 14 records
- Vault rank
- #74
- Am Law rank
- #90
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 21 records
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$255,000+
- K&L Gates LLP$225,000+
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$225,000+
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$1.99M
- K&L Gates LLP$1.63M
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$1.39M
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$1.28B
- K&L Gates LLP$1.37B
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$674.20M
Revenue per lawyer
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$1.26M
- K&L Gates LLP$808K
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$1.06M
- $255,000+
- $1.99M
- $1.28B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.26M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.63M
- Firm revenue
- $1.37B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $808K
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.39M
- Firm revenue
- $674.20M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.06M
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP2,000
- K&L Gates LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- K&L Gates LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- K&L Gates LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- K&L Gates LLP~1,700
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP~650
Offices
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP48
- K&L Gates LLP45
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP9
- 2,000
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Offices
- 48
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~1,700
- Offices
- 45
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~650
- Offices
- 9
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP100%
- K&L Gates LLP91.9%
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP100%
Class size
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP38 (year not confirmed)
- K&L Gates LLP44 (2026)
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP25 (2026)
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- K&L Gates LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPYes
- K&L Gates LLPYes
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPCase by Case
- 100%
- Class size
- 38 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 91.9%
- Class size
- 44 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 25 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Shared rankings
Rank differences
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 1
- K&L Gates LLPBand 2
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 1
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 1
- K&L Gates LLPBand 2
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 1
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 1
- K&L Gates LLPBand 1
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 2
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 1
- K&L Gates LLPBand 3
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 1
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 1
- K&L Gates LLPBand 3
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 1
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 1
- K&L Gates LLPBand 2
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 1
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 1
- K&L Gates LLPBand 3
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 3
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 1
- K&L Gates LLPBand 2
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 3
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 1
- K&L Gates LLPBand 2
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 2
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 2
- K&L Gates LLPBand 3
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 2
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- K&L Gates LLPBand 4 · Highly Regarded
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 4 · Highly Regarded
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.