Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP vs. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP vs. Susman Godfrey LLP
Category by category. Sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown.
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP
Est. 1912
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Est. 1944 · Seattle
- Susman Godfrey LLP
Est. 1980
Est. 1912
Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP is Vault #24. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Banking & Finance, and Construction. Operates from 48 offices worldwide.
Est. 1944 · Seattle
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP is a mid-size firm of ~635 attorneys, founded in Seattle, WA. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Advertising: NAD Proceedings, Banking & Finance, and Corporate/M&A.
Est. 1980
Susman Godfrey LLP is a ~226-attorney firm, Vault #19. Jurisdiction-specific Chambers rankings include Band 1 in Antitrust, Antitrust: Mainly Plaintiff, and Antitrust: Plaintiff.
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP#24
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP#74
- Susman Godfrey LLP#19
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP#51
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP#90
- Susman Godfrey LLP#92
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP25 records
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP21 records
- Susman Godfrey LLP7 records
- #24
- #51
- 25 records
- Vault rank
- #74
- Am Law rank
- #90
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 21 records
- Vault rank
- #19
- Am Law rank
- #92
- Reported Chambers Band 1 records
- 7 records
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$255,000+
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$225,000+
- Susman Godfrey LLP$240,000
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$1.99M
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$1.39M
- Susman Godfrey LLP$5.23M
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$1.28B
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$674.20M
- Susman Godfrey LLP$650.41M
Revenue per lawyer
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP$1.26M
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP$1.06M
- Susman Godfrey LLP$2.88M
- $255,000+
- $1.99M
- $1.28B
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.26M
- First-Year Comp
- $225,000+
- Profits Per Partner
- $1.39M
- Firm revenue
- $674.20M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $1.06M
- First-Year Comp
- $240,000
- Profits Per Partner
- $5.23M
- Firm revenue
- $650.41M
- Revenue per lawyer
- $2.88M
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP2,000
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Susman Godfrey LLPNot Reported
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Susman Godfrey LLP6 years
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Susman Godfrey LLPNot Reported
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP~650
- Susman Godfrey LLP~250
Offices
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP48
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP9
- Susman Godfrey LLP4
- 2,000
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Not Reported
- Offices
- 48
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- Not Reported
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~650
- Offices
- 9
- Billable target
- Not Reported
- Partnership track
- 6 years
- US associates per partner
- Not Reported
- Firm size (rounded to 50)
- ~250
- Offices
- 4
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP100%
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP100%
- Susman Godfrey LLP85.7%
Class size
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLP38 (year not confirmed)
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP25 (2026)
- Susman Godfrey LLP35 (year not confirmed)
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPNot Reported
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPNot Reported
- Susman Godfrey LLPNot Reported
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPYes
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPCase by Case
- Susman Godfrey LLPNo
- 100%
- Class size
- 38 (year not confirmed)
- Not Reported
- Yes
- Offer rate
- 100%
- Class size
- 25 (2026)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- Case by Case
- Offer rate
- 85.7%
- Class size
- 35 (year not confirmed)
- How associates get work
- Not Reported
- Specific practice area
- No
Green marks the stronger for the same practice, market and year. Shared results are listed once. split some top tables.
Rank differences
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 1
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 1
- Susman Godfrey LLPBand 2
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 1
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 2
- Susman Godfrey LLPBand 4
- Ashurst Perkins Coie LLPBand 3 · Highly Regarded
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPBand 4 · Highly Regarded
- Susman Godfrey LLPBand 2 · Elite
Firm-only and additional rankings remain available on each firm profile so missing coverage is not mistaken for a head-to-head loss.
See which of these firms are open on the Job Board
Data sources: Vault 2027, Am Law 200 FY2025, and reported Chambers records from the years shown. Chambers record counts can span years and reporting coverage varies; missing years or markets are not compared. Current Chambers bands were checked against each firm’s Chambers profile on Sep 26, 2026; where Chambers splits a table, every Elite firm ranks above every Highly Regarded firm. Missing values read “Not Reported”.